Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 23 of
23
with 100 triples per page.
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software accessdate "2013-11-03".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software accessdate "2015-04-15".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software accessdate "2015-12-05".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software date "2012-01-26".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software first "Alexandre".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software isCitedBy .dwg.
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software isCitedBy Blender_(software).
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software isCitedBy FreeCAD.
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software isCitedBy Free_and_open-source_software.
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software isCitedBy Free_software_license.
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software isCitedBy GNU_General_Public_License.
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software isCitedBy LibreCAD.
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software isCitedBy LibreDWG.
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software last "Prokoudine".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software publisher "Libre Graphics World".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software publisher "libregraphicsworld.org".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software quote "GPLv3 license. It doesn't work for end-user software, because they tend to use 3rd party components under different licenses that impose restrictions. FSF who are sole copyright holders of LibreDWG objected to relicensing. With regards to FreeCAD project and Yorik van Havre, its contributor, Richard Stallman stated:" You should not change the license of your library. Rather, it is best to make it clear to him what the conditions are." [...] Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their [LibreDWG's — LGW] GPL licensing. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force is something I dislike in particular. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible.".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software quote "[Assimp's Alexander Gessler:] "Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their [LibreDWG's — LGW] GPL licensing. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force is something I dislike in particular. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible." [Blender's Ton Roosendaal:] "Blender is also still "GPLv2 or later". For the time being we stick to that, moving to GPL 3 has no evident benefits I know of. My advice for LibreDWG: if you make a library, choosing a widely compatible license is a very positive choice."".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software quote "[Assimp's Alexander Gessler:] "Personally, I'm extremely unhappy with their [LibreDWG's — LGW] GPL licensing. It prohibits its use in Assimp and for many other applications as well. I don't like dogmatic ideologies, and freeing software by force is something I dislike in particular. It's fine for applications, because it doesn't hurt at this point, but, in my opinion, not for libraries that are designed to be used as freely as possible." [Blender's Toni Roosendaal:] "Blender is also still "GPLv2 or later". For the time being we stick to that, moving to GPL 3 has no evident benefits I know of. My advice for LibreDWG: if you make a library, choosing a widely compatible license is a very positive choice."".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software quote "[Blender's Toni Roosendaal:] "Blender is also still "GPLv2 or later". For the time being we stick to that, moving to GPL 3 has no evident benefits I know of."".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software quote "[Blender's Toni Roosendall:] "Blender is also still "GPLv2 or later". For the time being we stick to that, moving to GPL 3 has no evident benefits I know of. My advice for LibreDWG: if you make a library, choosing a widely compatible license is a very positive choice."".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software title "What's up with DWG adoption in free software?".
- whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software url whats-up-with-dwg-adoption-in-free-software.