Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <https://days2011.scala-lang.org/sites/days2011/files/ws3-1-Hundt.pdf> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 24 of
24
with 100 triples per page.
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf accessdate "2012-07-12".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf accessdate "2012-11-17".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf accessdate "2014-03-23".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf conference "Scala Days".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf date "2011-04-27".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf first "Robert".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf first1 "Robert".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf format "PDF; 318 kB".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf isCitedBy Comparison_of_Java_and_C++.
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf isCitedBy Go_(programming_language).
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf isCitedBy Java_(programming_language).
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf isCitedBy Java_performance.
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf last "Google".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf last "Hundt".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf last1 "Hundt".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf location "Stanford, California".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf publisher Google.
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf publisher "Scala Days 2011".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf quote "Java shows a large GC component, but a good code performance. [...] We find that in regards to performance, C++ wins out by a large margin. [...] The Java version was probably the simplest to implement, but the hardest to analyze for performance. Specifically the effects around garbage collection were complicated and very hard to tune".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf title "Loop Recognition in C++/Java/Go/Scala".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf title "Loop recognition in C++/Java/Go/Scala".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf url ws3-1-Hundt.pdf.
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf work "Scala Days 2011".
- ws3-1-Hundt.pdf year "2011".