Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 18 of
18
with 100 triples per page.
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio accessdate "2010-08-29".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio accessdate "February 2008".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio date "2007-12-20".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio first "Naomi".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio isCitedBy George_C._Marshall_Institute.
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio isCitedBy Global_warming_controversy.
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio last "Oreskes".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio publisher "YouTube".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio quote "But neither Seitz nor Singer ever retracted the charges, which was then repeated—many times, over and over again—by industry groups and think-tanks. And in fact, if you google "Ben Santer", these same charges are still in the Internet today. In fact, one site said that it was proven in 1996 that Santer had fraudulently altered the IPCC report.".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio quote "In 1995, the IPCC concluded that the human effect on climate is now discernible. The lead author of the key chapter on detection and attribution...was a scientist of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory named Benjamin J. Santer.".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio quote "Now Santer replied, in a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal, and in the response he explained that he had made changes, but those changes were in response to the peer review process. In other words, totally normal scientific practice...This account was corroborated by the Chairman of the IPCC and by all of the other authors of the chapters. In fact, over 40 scientists were co-authors of this chapter. This letter was signed by Santer and 40 others and published in the Wall Street Journal in June 1996. And Santer was also formally defended by the American Meteorological Society.".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio quote "They followed this with an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal entitled "A Major Deception on Global Warming". This piece was written by Seitz, in which he states that the effect of the changes was "to deceive policy makers and the public".".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio quote "When the IPCC report came out, Seitz, Nierenberg, and now a 4th physicist—a man by the name of S. Fred Singer—launched a highly personal attack on Santer. In an open letter to the IPCC, which they sent to numerous members of the US Congress, Singer, Seitz, and Nierenberg accused Santer of making "unauthorized" changes to the IPCC report [...]".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio title "The American Denial of Global Warming".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio title "The American Denial of Global Warming—The Truth About Denial".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio url watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio.
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio work "Perspectives on Ocean Science—UCSD-TV".
- watch?v=2T4UF_Rmlio year "2007".