Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13535a.htm> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 21 of
21
with 100 triples per page.
- 13535a.htm accessdate "2012-06-02".
- 13535a.htm contribution "The Eastern Schism".
- 13535a.htm date "1912-02-01".
- 13535a.htm encyclopedia "The Catholic Encyclopedia".
- 13535a.htm first "Adrian".
- 13535a.htm isCitedBy East–West_Schism.
- 13535a.htm isCitedBy Ecumenical_Patriarchate_of_Constantinople.
- 13535a.htm isCitedBy History_of_the_East–West_Schism.
- 13535a.htm isCitedBy Post-classical_history.
- 13535a.htm last "Fortescue".
- 13535a.htm location "New York City".
- 13535a.htm publisher "New advent".
- 13535a.htm publisher "Robert Appleton Company".
- 13535a.htm quote ""...in 1053 he [Michael Caerularius] sends off a declaration of war, then shuts up the Latin churches at Constantinople, hurls a string of wild accusations, and shows in every possible way that he wants a schism, apparently for the mere pleasure of not being in communion with the West. He got his wish. After a series of wanton aggressions, unparalleled in church history, after he had begun by striking the pope's name from his diptychs, the Roman legates excommunicated him . But still there was no idea of a general excommunication of the Byzantine Church, still less of all the East. The legates carefully provided against that in their Bull. They acknowledged that the emperor , the Senate, and the majority of the inhabitants of the city were "most pious and orthodox". They excommunicated Caerularius, Leo of Achrida, and their adherents. This quarrel, too, need no more have produced a permanent state of schism than the excommunication of any other contumacious bishop. The real tragedy is that gradually all the other Eastern patriarchs took sides with Caerularius, obeyed him by striking the pope's name from their diptychs, and chose of their own accord to share his schism. At first they do not seem to have wanted to do so. John III of Antioch certainly refused to go into schism at Caerularius's bidding. But, eventually, the habit they had acquired of looking to Constantinople for orders proved too strong. The emperor was on the side of his patriarch and they had learned too well to consider the emperor as their over-lord in spiritual matters too. Again, it was the usurped authority of Constantinople, the Erastianism of the East that turned a personal quarrel into a great schism."".
- 13535a.htm quote ""...in 1053 he [Michael Caerularius] sends off a declaration of war, then shuts up the Latin churches at Constantinople, hurls a string of wild accusations, and shows in every possible way that he wants a schism, apparently for the mere pleasure of not being in communion with the West. He got his wish. After a series of wanton aggressions, unparalleled in church history, after he had begun by striking the pope's name from his diptychs, the Roman legates excommunicated him . But still there was no idea of a general excommunication of the Byzantine Church, still less of all the East. The legates carefully provided against that in their Bull. They acknowledged that the emperor , the Senate, and the majority of the inhabitants of the city were "most pious and orthodox." They excommunicated Caerularius, Leo of Achrida, and their adherents. This quarrel, too, need no more have produced a permanent state of schism than the excommunication of any other contumacious bishop. The real tragedy is that gradually all the other Eastern patriarchs took sides with Caerularius, obeyed him by striking the pope's name from their diptychs, and chose of their own accord to share his schism. At first they do not seem to have wanted to do so. John III of Antioch certainly refused to go into schism at Caerularius's bidding. But, eventually, the habit they had acquired of looking to Constantinople for orders proved too strong. The emperor was on the side of his patriarch and they had learned too well to consider the emperor as their over-lord in spiritual matters too. Again, it was the usurped authority of Constantinople, the Erastianism of the East that turned a personal quarrel into a great schism."".
- 13535a.htm title "Catholic Encyclopedia".
- 13535a.htm title "New Catholic Encyclopedia".
- 13535a.htm title "The Eastern Schism".
- 13535a.htm url 13535a.htm.
- 13535a.htm volume "13".
- 13535a.htm year "1912".