Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2011/11/09/public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says/> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 9 of
9
with 100 triples per page.
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says accessdate "2012-08-09".
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says date "2011-11-09".
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says first "Mark".
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says isCitedBy Baltimore_Development_Corporation.
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says last "Reutter".
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says newspaper "Baltimore Brew".
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says quote "It cited tax breaks at Harbor East, Mondawmin Mall, Belvedere Square, Harbor East and Clipper Mill as examples of “reactive” city policy that used the “but for” rule, meaning that a project would not be built “but for” the use of tax incentives. “The city’s current stated TIF and PILOT policies clearly detail the ‘but for’ test as one of the requirements of approval. However, some in the public perceive that support is not equally available to all projects and developers, and that the financial analysis used to establish the ‘but for’ is not applied uniformly.”".
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says title "Subsidies to developers should be prioritized and better monitored, task force says".
- public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says url "http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2011/11/09/public-subsidies-to-developers-should-be-prioritized-and-better-monitored-task-force-says/".