Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7893519> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7893519 subject Q13394076.
- Q7893519 subject Q6996306.
- Q7893519 subject Q6996385.
- Q7893519 subject Q6996883.
- Q7893519 subject Q6997878.
- Q7893519 subject Q6998984.
- Q7893519 abstract "United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 537 U.S. 465 (2003), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5–4 decision that when the federal government used land or property held in trust for an Indian tribe, it had the duty to maintain that land or property and was liable for any damages for a breach of that duty. In the 1870s, the White Mountain Apache Tribe was placed on a reservation in Arizona. The case involved Fort Apache, a collection of buildings on the reservation which were transferred to the tribe by the United States Congress in 1960.Although the tribe owned the Fort Apache buildings, they were held in trust and used exclusively by the federal government for an Indian school. This was a continuation of the building's use from when the federal government retained title. As more schools were built at other Indian reservations, attendance dropped at the Fort Apache school. The tribe began to plan for use of the buildings and sought designation as a historic site. When the federal government wanted to turn the property over to the tribe for use, the tribe found that the property had deteriorated and sued for damages to the property. The trial court denied the tribe's claim, but the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the federal government had a duty to take care of the property. The government then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that the tribe could not make a claim without Congressional authorization. The tribe argued that the 1960 act created the trust and authorized damages.The Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court, holding that the federal government used the property it held in trust, and that it therefore had a duty to maintain the property. Justice Ginsburg issued a concurring opinion, while Justice Thomas dissented. The loss led the government to settle with the tribe for $12 million. The buildings are managed by the Fort Apache Heritage Foundation and the case, along with several others define the Indian Trust Doctrine. The case has been widely discussed in legal literature and books, primarily in the area of Indian trusts.".
- Q7893519 thumbnail White_Mountain_Apache_Tribe.jpg?width=300.
- Q7893519 wikiPageExternalLink 01-1067_20021202-argument.mp3.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q1010563.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q1056352.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q108266.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q11116.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q11142.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q11268.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q11696.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q117255.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q1258086.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q13394076.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q16242854.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q1763845.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q1899048.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q193216.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q1967040.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q2297150.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q2298067.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q2404841.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q2457196.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q2911328.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q30216.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q308439.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q3244110.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q34836.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q3719.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q46350.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q472547.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q5256431.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q5470741.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q608427.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q6495575.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q6973378.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996385.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996883.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997878.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998984.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q746654.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q7851051.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889676.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q7893396.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q814169.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q816.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q841917.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q843280.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q9212.
- Q7893519 wikiPageWikiLink Q925502.
- Q7893519 fullname "United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe".
- Q7893519 type Case.
- Q7893519 type LegalCase.
- Q7893519 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q7893519 type UnitOfWork.
- Q7893519 type Situation.
- Q7893519 type Thing.
- Q7893519 type Q2334719.
- Q7893519 comment "United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 537 U.S. 465 (2003), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5–4 decision that when the federal government used land or property held in trust for an Indian tribe, it had the duty to maintain that land or property and was liable for any damages for a breach of that duty. In the 1870s, the White Mountain Apache Tribe was placed on a reservation in Arizona.".
- Q7893519 label "United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe".
- Q7893519 depiction White_Mountain_Apache_Tribe.jpg.
- Q7893519 name "United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe".