Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7893268> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7893268 subject Q6996306.
- Q7893268 subject Q6996385.
- Q7893268 subject Q6997607.
- Q7893268 subject Q6998990.
- Q7893268 abstract "United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that, in a criminal proceeding in federal court, a defendant who does not alert the district court to a possible violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure must show on appeal that the violation affirmatively affected his rights in order to obtain reversal of his conviction by guilty plea. Rule 11, which pertains to criminal prosecutions in United States federal courts only, governs the offering of plea bargains to criminal defendants and the procedures district courts must employ to ensure that the defendant knows of and properly waives his trial-related constitutional rights.In Benitez, the trial court violated Rule 11 when it took the defendant's plea by failing to warn him that the plea could not be withdrawn if the court did not accept the prosecution's sentencing recommendations. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the conviction, considering that the non-English speaking defendant did not understand his rights under those circumstances.The Supreme Court unanimously reversed, ruling the Court of Appeals had applied the wrong test by not requiring the defendant to show how the error actually prejudiced the proceedings. The Court of Appeals had consequently failed to consider the entire record regarding what the defendant understood. An eight-justice majority of the Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice David Souter, held that a defendant attempting to reverse his conviction due to a Rule 11 violation must show a reasonable probability that, but for the trial court's error, he would not have entered the plea. Justice Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment but disagreed with the majority's standard.".
- Q7893268 wikiPageExternalLink 03-167.pdf.
- Q7893268 wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Q7893268 wikiPageExternalLink 1743.
- Q7893268 wikiPageExternalLink 2003-0167.mer.ja.html.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q1056352.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q11144.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q11156.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q1321.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q1323789.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q191924.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q2070065.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q2094335.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q2358778.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q2905670.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q3245991.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q472547.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q4726209.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q5156965.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q5440011.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q5440359.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q6141576.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q651929.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q6528049.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602066.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q664736.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996385.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997607.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998990.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q7311531.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q7329388.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q7398675.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q7610345.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889764.
- Q7893268 wikiPageWikiLink Q9012745.
- Q7893268 fullname "United States, Petitioner v. Carlos Dominguez Benitez".
- Q7893268 type Case.
- Q7893268 type LegalCase.
- Q7893268 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q7893268 type UnitOfWork.
- Q7893268 type Situation.
- Q7893268 type Thing.
- Q7893268 type Q2334719.
- Q7893268 comment "United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that, in a criminal proceeding in federal court, a defendant who does not alert the district court to a possible violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure must show on appeal that the violation affirmatively affected his rights in order to obtain reversal of his conviction by guilty plea.".
- Q7893268 label "United States v. Dominguez Benitez".
- Q7893268 name "United States, Petitioner v. Carlos Dominguez Benitez".