Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7672629> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7672629 subject Q8188821.
- Q7672629 subject Q8189157.
- Q7672629 subject Q8427710.
- Q7672629 subject Q8759206.
- Q7672629 abstract "T 258/03, also known as Auction Method/Hitachi, is a decision of a Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), issued on April 21, 2004. It is a landmark decision for interpreting Article 52(1) and (2) of the European Patent Convention (EPC) which built on the principles suggested by the same Board in T 641/00 (Comvik, Two identities). This decision, amongst others, but notably this one and T 641/00, significantly affected the assessment of an invention’s technical character and inventive step.It mainly stated that "a method involving technical means [was] an invention within the meaning of Article 52(1) EPC" and in stating so contrasts with T 931/95 (Pension Benefit Systems Partnership), which held that "the mere fact that data processing and computing means, i.e. technical means, [were] recited in a method claim [did] not necessarily confer a technical character to the claimed method". T 258/03 put apparatus and method claims on an equal footing for the patentability examination of Article 52(2) EPC.In other words, the Board of Appeal in this decision "pointed the way to the new test and argued that the term ‘invention’ in the definition of patentable inventions set out in Article 52(1) of the EPC was merely to be construed as ‘subject matter having technical character’. Thus, the presence of computer hardware in a claim to a business method, providing a technical character, would now be sufficient to overcome the business method objection, regardless of technical contribution."".
- Q7672629 thumbnail Scale_of_justice_2.svg?width=300.
- Q7672629 wikiPageExternalLink t030258ex1.htm.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q11472.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q1185084.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q12139145.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q1350126.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q1378173.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q165447.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q285265.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q3022019.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q37260.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q44127.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q4780971.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q5515115.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q6027831.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q6059888.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q6615750.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q7144529.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q727746.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q7672626.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q7672628.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q8188821.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q8189157.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q8427710.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q870860.
- Q7672629 wikiPageWikiLink Q8759206.
- Q7672629 comment "T 258/03, also known as Auction Method/Hitachi, is a decision of a Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), issued on April 21, 2004. It is a landmark decision for interpreting Article 52(1) and (2) of the European Patent Convention (EPC) which built on the principles suggested by the same Board in T 641/00 (Comvik, Two identities).".
- Q7672629 label "T 258/03".
- Q7672629 depiction Scale_of_justice_2.svg.