Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7625077> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 16 of
16
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7625077 subject Q6488282.
- Q7625077 subject Q7144653.
- Q7625077 subject Q8881767.
- Q7625077 abstract "In structural anthropology, Claude Lévi-Strauss, a French anthropologist, makes the claim that "myth is language". Through approaching mythology as language, Lévi-Strauss suggests that it can be approached the same way as language can be approached by the same structuralist methods used to address language. Lévi-Strauss clarifies, "Myth is language, functioning on an especially high level where meaning succeeds practically at 'taking off' from the linguistic ground on which it keeps rolling."Lévi-Strauss breaks down his argument into three main parts. Meaning is not isolated within the specific fundamental parts of the myth, but rather within the composition of these parts. Although myth and language are of similar categories, language functions differently in myth. Finally, language in myth exhibits more complex functions than in any other linguistic expression. From these suggestions, he draws the conclusion that myth can be broken down into constituent units, and these units are different from the constituents of language. Finally, unlike the constituents of language, the constituents of a myth, which he labels “mythemes,” function as "bundles of relations."This approach is a break from the “symbolists”, such as Carl Jung, who dedicate themselves to find meaning solely within the constituents rather than their relations. For instance, Lévi-Strauss uses the example of the Oedipus myth and breaks it down to its component parts:Reading it in sequence from left to right, top to bottom, the myth is categorized sequentially and by similarities. Through analyzing the commonalities between the “mythemes” of the Oedipus story, understandings can be wrought from its categories. Thus, a structural approach towards myths is to address all of these constituents. Furthermore, a structural approach should account for all versions of a myth, as all versions are relevant to the function of the myth as a whole. This leads to what Lévi-Strauss calls a spiral growth of the myth which is continuous while the structure itself is not. The growth of the myth only ends when the “intellectual impulse which has produced it is exhausted.”".
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q128126.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q130890.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q164800.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q41532.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q4773904.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q5111399.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q6488282.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q7144653.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q7895804.
- Q7625077 wikiPageWikiLink Q8881767.
- Q7625077 comment "In structural anthropology, Claude Lévi-Strauss, a French anthropologist, makes the claim that "myth is language". Through approaching mythology as language, Lévi-Strauss suggests that it can be approached the same way as language can be approached by the same structuralist methods used to address language.".
- Q7625077 label "Structuralist theory of mythology".