Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7441775> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 49 of
49
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7441775 subject Q6996306.
- Q7441775 subject Q6996516.
- Q7441775 subject Q6998806.
- Q7441775 subject Q8724342.
- Q7441775 abstract "Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case which limited state law on unfair competition when it prevents the copying of an item that is not covered by a patent.Justice Hugo Black wrote for a unanimous Court that the Constitution reserved power over intellectual property such as patents to the federal government exclusively. Since the trial court had found Stiffel's patent invalid as insufficiently inventive, its product design was thus in the public domain and no state law could be used to prevent Sears from copying it.The Supreme Court made a similar ruling in a companion case decided the same day, Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964).These two cases were the first decisions of the Supreme Court that states could not, because of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, create their own patent or patent-like laws. The issue had been raised, but not decided, in Gibbons v. Ogden, in which Attorney General Wirt argued on behalf of the United States for federal patent preemption of New York's grant of a steamboat patent to Robert Fulton.".
- Q7441775 thumbnail Stiffel.jpg?width=300.
- Q7441775 wikiPageExternalLink viewcontent.cgi?article=3719&context=fss_papers.
- Q7441775 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q1056352.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q11698.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q1244572.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q131257.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q1350126.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q192496.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q19652.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q250451.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q253623.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q3308289.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q4173982.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q459752.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q48416.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q4942078.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q5156179.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q5264361.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q6499202.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q693033.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996516.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998806.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q7144498.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q7644794.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q7832040.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889822.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q8724342.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q7441775 wikiPageWikiLink Q957749.
- Q7441775 fullname "Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.".
- Q7441775 type Case.
- Q7441775 type LegalCase.
- Q7441775 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q7441775 type UnitOfWork.
- Q7441775 type Situation.
- Q7441775 type Thing.
- Q7441775 type Q2334719.
- Q7441775 comment "Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case which limited state law on unfair competition when it prevents the copying of an item that is not covered by a patent.Justice Hugo Black wrote for a unanimous Court that the Constitution reserved power over intellectual property such as patents to the federal government exclusively.".
- Q7441775 label "Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.".
- Q7441775 depiction Stiffel.jpg.
- Q7441775 name "Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.".