Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7380725> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 30 of
30
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7380725 subject Q6996306.
- Q7380725 subject Q6996385.
- Q7380725 subject Q6998976.
- Q7380725 subject Q8412872.
- Q7380725 subject Q8804112.
- Q7380725 abstract "Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. 355 (2002) was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) did not preempt an Illinois medical-review statute. ERISA envisions a national standard for welfare and pension plans so state laws which "relate to" ERISA plans are preempted under Section 514 of ERISA. However, ERISA contains a "savings" clause which saves state laws which regulate insurance under Section 514(b). The statute at issue in Moran regulated insurance, which is one of the functions HMOs perform. Although HMOs provide healthcare as well as insurance, the statute does not require choosing a single or primary function of an HMO. Congress has long recognized that HMOs are risk-bearing organizations subject to state regulation. Finally, allowing States to regulate the insurance aspects of HMOs will not interfere with the desire of Congress for uniform national standards under ERISA.".
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q11268.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q1204.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q5374276.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q5440550.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q563787.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602066.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602616.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996385.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998976.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q8412872.
- Q7380725 wikiPageWikiLink Q8804112.
- Q7380725 fullname "Rush Prudential HMO, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Debra C. Moran, et al.".
- Q7380725 type Case.
- Q7380725 type LegalCase.
- Q7380725 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q7380725 type UnitOfWork.
- Q7380725 type Situation.
- Q7380725 type Thing.
- Q7380725 type Q2334719.
- Q7380725 comment "Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. 355 (2002) was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) did not preempt an Illinois medical-review statute. ERISA envisions a national standard for welfare and pension plans so state laws which "relate to" ERISA plans are preempted under Section 514 of ERISA.".
- Q7380725 label "Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran".
- Q7380725 name "Rush Prudential HMO, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Debra C. Moran, et al.".