Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q729193> ?p ?o }
- Q729193 subject Q15099761.
- Q729193 subject Q8262859.
- Q729193 subject Q8425986.
- Q729193 subject Q8550058.
- Q729193 subject Q8834534.
- Q729193 abstract "The teleological or physico-theological argument, also known as the argument from design, or intelligent design argument is an argument for the existence of God or, more generally, for an intelligent creator "based on perceived evidence of deliberate design in the natural or physical world". It is historically closely associated with the concept of Natural Theology.The earliest recorded versions of this argument are associated with Socrates in ancient Greece, although it has been argued that he was taking up an older argument. Plato, his student, and Aristotle, Plato's student, developed complex approaches to the proposal that the cosmos has an intelligent cause, but it was the Stoics who, under their influence, "developed the battery of creationist arguments broadly known under the label "The Argument from Design"".Socratic philosophy influenced the development of the Abrahamic religions in many ways, and the teleological argument has a long association with them. In the Middle Ages, Islamic theologians such as Al Ghazali used the argument, although it was rejected as unnecessary by Quranic literalists, and as unconvincing by many Islamic philosophers. Later, the teleological argument was accepted by Saint Thomas Aquinas and included as the fifth of his "Five Ways" of proving the existence of God. In early modern England clergymen such as William Turner and John Ray were well-known proponents. In the early 18th century, William Derham published his Physico-Theology, which gave his "demonstration of the being and attributes of God from his works of creation". Later, William Paley, in his 1802 work on natural theology, published a prominent presentation of the design argument with his version of the watchmaker analogy and the first use of the phrase "argument from design".From the beginning, there have been numerous criticisms of the different versions of the teleological argument, and responses to its challenge to the claims against non-teleological natural science. Especially important were the general logical arguments made by David Hume in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, published 1779, and the explanation of biological complexity given in Charles Darwin's Origin of Species, published in 1859. Since the 1960s, Paley's arguments, including the words "intelligent design", have been influential in the development of a creation science movement, especially the form known as the intelligent design movement, which not only uses the teleological argument to argue against the modern Darwinian understanding of evolution, but also makes the philosophical claim that it can provide a basis for scientific proof of the divine origin of biological species.Also starting already in classical Greece, two approaches to the teleological argument developed, distinguished by their understanding of whether the natural order was literally created or not. The non-creationist approach starts most clearly with Aristotle, although many thinkers, such as the Neoplatonists, believed it was already intended by Plato. This approach is not creationist in a simple sense, because while it agrees that a cosmic intelligence is responsible for the natural order, it rejects the proposal that this requires a "creator" to physically make and maintain this order. The Neoplatonists did not find the teleological argument convincing, and in this they were followed by medieval philosophers such as Al-Farabi and Avicenna. Later, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas considered the argument acceptable, but not necessarily the best argument. In contrast to the approach of such philosophers and theologians, the intelligent design movement makes a creationist claim for an intelligence that intervenes in the natural order.".
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink frameset?itemID=A142&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink teleological-arguments.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink dhi.cgi?id=dv1-80.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink design.html.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink purpose_revised.html.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink EvidenceForDesignInTheUniverse.html.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink design.htm.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink design.html.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink teleo.html.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink God-after-Darwin.php.
- Q729193 wikiPageExternalLink ?id=ady3NSvPi_8C.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q10261.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1028964.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1035.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1062821.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1063.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1068658.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1089030.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1129353.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1139338.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q11415.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1153168.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1186769.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q11891017.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1192931.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1211539.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1233528.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q123397.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q12370437.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q127398.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q130352.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1306656.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q131252.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1327399.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1356572.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1367280.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1373343.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1398235.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1400.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1401749.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q14278.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q15099761.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1541.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q154959.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q160460.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q162145.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1621623.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q164828.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1699404.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q17162573.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q17166064.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q172618.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q178161.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q178354.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q178540.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q178668.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q179.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q179289.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q179541.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q180619.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q180832.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q182505.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q183397.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q183488.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1854518.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q186619.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q188794.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q191964.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q1973406.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q200569.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q20124.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q202344.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q204100.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q205921.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q212318.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q214070.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q2141696.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q215263.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q219429.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q220002.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q220972.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q224180.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q2326055.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q235470.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q240581.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q244161.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q2451675.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q245265.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q249821.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q251348.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q269323.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q2748292.
- Q729193 wikiPageWikiLink Q280817.