Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7229799> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7229799 subject Q8173834.
- Q7229799 subject Q8301471.
- Q7229799 subject Q8373071.
- Q7229799 subject Q8746064.
- Q7229799 abstract "Population control in Singapore spans two distinct phases: first to slow and reverse the boom in births that started after World War II; and then, from the 1980s onwards, to encourage parents to have more children because birth numbers had fallen below replacement levels. Government eugenics policies flavoured both phases. In 1960s and 1970s, the anti-natalist policies flourished. The Family Planning and Population Board (FPPB) was established, initially advocating small families but eventually running the Stop at Two programme, which pushed for small two-children families and promoted sterilisation. From 1969 it was also used by government leaders to target lowly educated and low-income women in an experiment with eugenics policies to solve social concerns.Government leaders also announced the Graduate Mothers' Scheme in 1984, which favoured the children of mothers with a university degree in primary school placement and registration process over the lesser-educated. After the outcry in the 1984 general elections it was eventually scrapped.Singapore had also been undergoing the demographic transition and birth rates had fallen precipitously. The government eventually became pro-natalist, and officially announced its replacement Have Three or More (if you can afford it) in 1987, in which the government continued its efforts to better the quality and quantity of the population while discouraging low-income families from having children. The Social Development Unit (SDU) was also established in 1984 to promote marriage and romance between educated individuals.Different sources have offered differing judgments on the government policies' impact on the population structure of Singapore. While Stop at Two has been described as basically successful or "over-successful", sceptics of interventionism claim that the demographic transition would have occurred anyway – noting that the government's attempts at reversing the falling birth rates due to the demographic transition have been less than successful.".
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q1003039.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q11722724.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q1196585.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q1221899.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q122224.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q12301128.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q1280670.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q130819.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q131248.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q131454.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q1423426.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q170480.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q1764560.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q18142.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q1934365.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q201759.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q223569.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q2359833.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q2382270.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q2790461.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q285897.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q2891097.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q2995015.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q3024268.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q324503.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q328566.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q3306197.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q331439.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q334.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q362.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q3634022.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q371395.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q379609.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q381763.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q386191.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q40238.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q4116184.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q41675.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q4200548.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q4373718.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q4383964.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q44854.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q4764961.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q4838434.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q493845.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q4968823.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q498921.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q5000589.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q5500224.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q57643.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q598949.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q6024146.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q610548.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q6332329.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q6741676.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q6807000.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q6971980.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q6972133.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q6972471.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q7239892.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q7278958.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q7458780.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q7522850.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q7523295.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q7550626.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q8054968.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q8173834.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q8301471.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q8373071.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q847808.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q8746064.
- Q7229799 wikiPageWikiLink Q912512.
- Q7229799 type Thing.
- Q7229799 comment "Population control in Singapore spans two distinct phases: first to slow and reverse the boom in births that started after World War II; and then, from the 1980s onwards, to encourage parents to have more children because birth numbers had fallen below replacement levels. Government eugenics policies flavoured both phases. In 1960s and 1970s, the anti-natalist policies flourished.".
- Q7229799 label "Population control in Singapore".
- Q7229799 seeAlso Q2359833.