Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7136818> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7136818 subject Q6996306.
- Q7136818 subject Q6996388.
- Q7136818 subject Q6996755.
- Q7136818 subject Q6996934.
- Q7136818 subject Q6999003.
- Q7136818 subject Q8406077.
- Q7136818 subject Q8518583.
- Q7136818 subject Q8565293.
- Q7136818 abstract "Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007), also known as the "PICS" case, is a United States Supreme Court case. At issue were voluntary school desegregation/integration efforts in Seattle, Washington and Louisville, Kentucky. Both school districts voluntarily used individualized racial classifications to achieve diversity and/or avoid racial isolation through student assignment. The Court recognized that seeking diversity and avoiding racial isolation are compelling state interests. However, the Court struck down both school districts' assignment plans, finding that the plans were not sufficiently "narrowly tailored," a legal term that essentially suggests that the means or method being employed (in this case, a student assignment plan based on individualized racial classifications) is closely and narrowly tied to the ends (the stated goals of achieving diversity and/or avoiding racial isolation).The Parents Involved decision was a "split decision"—the Court broke 4–1–4 on key aspects of the case, with Justice Kennedy writing the swing vote opinion. Kennedy agreed with four Justices (Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito) that the programs used by Seattle and Louisville did not pass constitutional muster (because the districts failed to demonstrate that their plans were sufficiently narrowly tailored); but Kennedy also found, along with four Justices (Breyer, Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg), that compelling interests exist in avoiding racial isolation and promoting diversity. With respect to avoiding racial isolation, Kennedy wrote that, "[a] compelling interest exists in avoiding racial isolation, an interest that a school district, in its discretion and expertise, may choose to pursue." He went on to say that, "[w]hat the government is not permitted to do, absent a showing of necessity not made here, is to classify every student on the basis of race and to assign each of them to schools based on that classification."None of the nine Supreme Court Justices disputed that, as Justice Kennedy put it, the case was "argued on the assumption...that the discrimination in question did not result from de jure [i.e. state-sponsored] actions." This made the case different from Brown v. Board of Education. All of the dissenting Justices acknowledged that "the Constitution does not impose a duty to desegregate upon districts," if the districts have not practiced racial discrimination. However, the dissenters argued that the Constitution permits such desegregation, even though it does not require it.The 4–1–4 split makes PICS somewhat similar to the 1978 Bakke case, which held that affirmative action was unconstitutional in the case directly before the Court; but, nonetheless, Bakke was used to uphold the validity of affirmative action programs that fostered diversity in higher education for a quarter of a century. To this end, in 2011, the U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice jointly issued Guidance on the Voluntary Use of Race to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools, acknowledging the flexibility that school districts have in taking proactive steps to meet the compelling interests of promoting diversity and avoiding racial isolation within the parameters of current law.".
- Q7136818 wikiPageExternalLink Goldstein.pdf.
- Q7136818 wikiPageExternalLink Parents_v._Seattle.
- Q7136818 wikiPageExternalLink 05-908.html.
- Q7136818 wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Q7136818 wikiPageExternalLink guidance-ese-201111.html.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q1056352.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q11109.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q11124.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q11153.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q11171.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q132555.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q1553390.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q1620945.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q1641851.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q1700972.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q188116.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q2358778.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q250472.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q3236113.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q398141.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q43668.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q48532.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q5083.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q5375046.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q5597739.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q5603613.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q5612369.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q6175438.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q656660.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q6816615.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996388.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996755.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996934.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q6999003.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q7308137.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q7623621.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q7653615.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q7684514.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889859.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q8406077.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q8518583.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q8565293.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q861556.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q875738.
- Q7136818 wikiPageWikiLink Q9826.
- Q7136818 fullname "Parents Involved in Community Schools, Petitioner v. Seattle School District No. 1, et al.; Crystal D. Meredith, Custodial Parent and Next Friend of Joshua Ryan McDonald v. Jefferson County Board of Education, et al.".
- Q7136818 type Case.
- Q7136818 type LegalCase.
- Q7136818 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q7136818 type UnitOfWork.
- Q7136818 type Situation.
- Q7136818 type Thing.
- Q7136818 type Q2334719.
- Q7136818 comment "Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007), also known as the "PICS" case, is a United States Supreme Court case. At issue were voluntary school desegregation/integration efforts in Seattle, Washington and Louisville, Kentucky. Both school districts voluntarily used individualized racial classifications to achieve diversity and/or avoid racial isolation through student assignment.".
- Q7136818 label "Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1".
- Q7136818 name "Parents Involved in Community Schools, Petitioner v. Seattle School District No. 1, et al.; Crystal D. Meredith, Custodial Parent and Next Friend of Joshua Ryan McDonald v. Jefferson County Board of Education, et al.".