Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q7060707> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 24 of
24
with 100 triples per page.
- Q7060707 subject Q6996306.
- Q7060707 subject Q6996385.
- Q7060707 subject Q6996738.
- Q7060707 subject Q6998990.
- Q7060707 subject Q8189336.
- Q7060707 abstract "Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance 542 U.S. 55 (2004) was a Supreme Court case that held that although the Administrative Procedure Act says that a person may challenge an agency's failure to act, this provision essentially just carries forward the writ of mandamus. Thus an agency cannot be compelled to act unless there is some non-discretionary, discrete act. Therefore, in this case, an interest group could not challenge an agency's failure to "act so as to preserve the wilderness" in accordance with the statute.".
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q312424.
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q3245991.
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q4683478.
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602066.
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996385.
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996738.
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998990.
- Q7060707 wikiPageWikiLink Q8189336.
- Q7060707 type Case.
- Q7060707 type LegalCase.
- Q7060707 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q7060707 type UnitOfWork.
- Q7060707 type Situation.
- Q7060707 type Thing.
- Q7060707 type Q2334719.
- Q7060707 comment "Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance 542 U.S. 55 (2004) was a Supreme Court case that held that although the Administrative Procedure Act says that a person may challenge an agency's failure to act, this provision essentially just carries forward the writ of mandamus. Thus an agency cannot be compelled to act unless there is some non-discretionary, discrete act.".
- Q7060707 label "Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance".