Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6959653> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6959653 subject Q6996724.
- Q6959653 subject Q6998748.
- Q6959653 subject Q8147611.
- Q6959653 subject Q8443159.
- Q6959653 subject Q8609742.
- Q6959653 subject Q8646034.
- Q6959653 abstract "Naim v. Naim, 197 Va 80; 87 S.E.2d 749 (1955) is a case regarding interracial marriage. The case was decided by the Supreme Court of Virginia on June 13, 1955. The Court held the marriage between the appellant (Han Say Naim) and the appellee (Ruby Elaine Naim) to be void under the Code of Virginia (1950).The appellee, a white woman living in Virginia, and the appellant, a Chinese man not living in Virginia, went to North Carolina to be married on June 26, 1952, specifically because there was a Virginia statute, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, banning interracial marriage, while North Carolina law only banned marriages between Whites and Blacks, not between Whites and Asians. They then returned to Virginia, where they lived as husband and wife. A year after the marriage, Ruby Naim filed for annulment, as the marriage was in contravention of Virginia's miscegenation laws, with Han Say Naim arguing that a marriage valid in North Carolina was valid throughout the United States. The circuit court of the city of Portsmouth granted an annulment, but Han Say Naim appealed to the state supreme court, which upheld the circuit court's decision. The Virginia statute stated:It shall hereafter be unlawful for any white person in this State to marry any save a white person, or a person with no other admixture of blood than white and American Indian. For the purpose of this chapter, the term 'white person' shall apply only to such person as has no trace whatever of any blood other than Caucasian; but persons who have one-sixteenth or less of the blood of the American Indian and have no other non-Caucasic blood shall be deemed to be white persons. All laws heretofore passed and now in effect regarding the intermarriage of white and colored persons shall apply to marriages prohibited by this chapterHan Say Naim's attorney, David Carliner, attempted to appeal the state's decision to the Supreme Court of the United States, with the backing of the American Jewish Congress, the Japanese American Citizens League, the Association on American Indian Affairs and the Association of Immigration and Nationality Lawyers. The justices, however, refused to consider the appeal, fearing that to do so would further encourage opposition to the enforcement of Brown v. Board of Education.".
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q1345835.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q16960472.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q16962353.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q2398783.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q329777.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q342803.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q465330.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q5140088.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q5258554.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q6158090.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q656660.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q692336.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996724.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998748.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q701040.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q7121915.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q8147611.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q8443159.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q8609742.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q8646034.
- Q6959653 wikiPageWikiLink Q875738.
- Q6959653 comment "Naim v. Naim, 197 Va 80; 87 S.E.2d 749 (1955) is a case regarding interracial marriage. The case was decided by the Supreme Court of Virginia on June 13, 1955.".
- Q6959653 label "Naim v. Naim".