Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6851839> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 16 of
16
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6851839 subject Q7210444.
- Q6851839 subject Q8366783.
- Q6851839 abstract "The Miliband–Poulantzas debate was a debate between Marxist theorists Ralph Miliband and Nicos Poulantzas concerning the nature of the state. Their exchange was published in New Left Review, beginning with Poulantzas's review of Miliband's 1969 publication on bourgeois democracies, The State in Capitalist Society. In their exchange, Miliband argues for an instrumentalist model of the capitalist state, whereas Poulantzas takes a structural position.In The State in Capitalist Society, Miliband puts forth his theory of how the state functions to serve capitalist interests. It does so, he claims, because of (1) the social origins of members of state government and (2) the personal ties and influence between members of state government and the ruling-class elites.Poulantzas disagrees with Miliband's approach, adopting a structural position. He claims the state is objectively a capitalist entity, which can serve no purpose other than preserving the capitalist mode of production. Furthermore, he argues that if members of the ruling class are the same people as those who manage the state, this is merely a coincidence: the state serves capitalist interests regardless of who is in charge. In his critique he claims,“The relation between the bourgeois class and the state is an objective relation. This means that if the function of the state in a determinate social formation and the interests of the dominant class coincide, it is by reason of the system itself: the direct participation of members of the ruling class in the state apparatus is not the cause but the effect…”In a response to Poulantzas's criticisms, Miliband counters that Poulantzas's position allows no room for agency and is therefore too limiting. His point of view does not allow individuals to make decisions based on their own free will; rather, their decisions are determined solely by the structure of society."For what his exclusive stress on ‘objective relations’ suggests is that what the state does is in every particular and at all times wholly determined by these ‘objective relations’: in other words, that the structural constraints of the system are so absolutely compelling as to turn those who run the state into the merest functionaries and executants of policies imposed upon them by ‘the system’"".
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q12056630.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q2036385.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q206249.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q2096707.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q3132726.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q385166.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q4691992.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q505296.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q6041898.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q7210444.
- Q6851839 wikiPageWikiLink Q8366783.
- Q6851839 comment "The Miliband–Poulantzas debate was a debate between Marxist theorists Ralph Miliband and Nicos Poulantzas concerning the nature of the state. Their exchange was published in New Left Review, beginning with Poulantzas's review of Miliband's 1969 publication on bourgeois democracies, The State in Capitalist Society.".
- Q6851839 label "Miliband–Poulantzas debate".