Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6812174> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6812174 subject Q6996306.
- Q6812174 subject Q6996388.
- Q6812174 subject Q6997122.
- Q6812174 subject Q6997649.
- Q6812174 subject Q6999011.
- Q6812174 subject Q8385807.
- Q6812174 abstract "Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it was a violation of the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of the person who performed the test. While the court ruled that the then-common practice of submitting these reports without testimony was unconstitutional, it also held that so called "notice-and-demand" statutes are constitutional. A state would not violate the Constitution through a "notice-and-demand" statute by both putting the defendant on notice that the prosecution would submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of the scientist and also giving the defendant sufficient time to raise an objection.".
- Q6812174 wikiPageExternalLink melendez-diaz.v.massachusetts-overview.
- Q6812174 wikiPageExternalLink papers.cfm?abstract_id=1774182.
- Q6812174 wikiPageExternalLink melendez.
- Q6812174 wikiPageExternalLink 07-591.ZS.html.
- Q6812174 wikiPageExternalLink 2008_07_591.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q100.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q1056352.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q1196258.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q1211464.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q13368786.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q142937.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q1522314.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q15479268.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q156537.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q17149198.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q17164755.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q1753080.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q178844.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q2002625.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q246624.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q3125101.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q41576.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q457021.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q46350.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q5001928.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q5157242.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q5160294.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q5182934.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q5242011.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q5440424.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q5608642.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q587862.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6176111.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602066.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602628.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q665141.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6784179.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996388.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997122.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997649.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q6999011.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q7081062.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q7240951.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q771.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q837138.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q8385807.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q895824.
- Q6812174 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q6812174 fullname "Luis E. Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts".
- Q6812174 type Case.
- Q6812174 type LegalCase.
- Q6812174 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q6812174 type UnitOfWork.
- Q6812174 type Situation.
- Q6812174 type Thing.
- Q6812174 type Q2334719.
- Q6812174 comment "Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it was a violation of the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of the person who performed the test. While the court ruled that the then-common practice of submitting these reports without testimony was unconstitutional, it also held that so called "notice-and-demand" statutes are constitutional.".
- Q6812174 label "Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts".
- Q6812174 name "Luis E. Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts".