Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6800599> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 27 of
27
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6800599 subject Q6996254.
- Q6800599 subject Q6997925.
- Q6800599 subject Q6998990.
- Q6800599 subject Q8584761.
- Q6800599 abstract "McCorvey v. Hill, 385 F.3d 846 (5th Cir. 2004), was a case in which the principal original litigant in Roe v. Wade, (1973) Norma McCorvey, also known as 'Jane Roe', requested the overturning of Roe. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that McCorvey could not do this; the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on February 22, 2005, rendering the opinion of the Fifth Circuit final. The opinion for the Fifth Circuit was written by Judge Edith Jones, who also filed a concurrence to her opinion for the court.".
- Q6800599 wikiPageExternalLink 03-10711-CV0.wpd.pdf.
- Q6800599 wikiPageExternalLink Rule60.htm.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q1056352.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q1129261.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q2107009.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q250456.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q300950.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q3273384.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q377110.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q5440427.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q683979.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996254.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997925.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998990.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889831.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q7907894.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q8584761.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q883942.
- Q6800599 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q6800599 comment "McCorvey v. Hill, 385 F.3d 846 (5th Cir. 2004), was a case in which the principal original litigant in Roe v. Wade, (1973) Norma McCorvey, also known as 'Jane Roe', requested the overturning of Roe. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that McCorvey could not do this; the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on February 22, 2005, rendering the opinion of the Fifth Circuit final.".
- Q6800599 label "McCorvey v. Hill".