Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6791501> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 32 of
32
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6791501 subject Q6994766.
- Q6791501 subject Q6994780.
- Q6791501 subject Q8138055.
- Q6791501 subject Q8276803.
- Q6791501 abstract "Template:Infobox court caseMatthews v Chicory Marketing Board (Vic) (1938) 60 CLR 263 is a High Court of Australia case that considered section 90 of the Australian Constitution, which prohibits States from levying excise (taxes). Although the meaning of excise was considered in Peterswald v Bartley, this case significantly broadened its reach.In this case, the law in question was a Victorian tax on producers of chicory, which was measured at the rate of one pound per half-acre, of land planted with the crop. The minority in this case, consisting of Latham CJ and McTiernan J, followed the Peterswald definition and held that an excise must have some relation to the quantity or value of the goods.On the contrary, the majority, whose principal judgment was delivered by Dixon J, allowed this extension. After examining the history of excise in England, his Honour concluded that the definition in Peterswald may be too narrow. All that is required is that the "tax must bear a close relation to the production or manufacture, the sale or the consumption of goods and must be of such a nature as to affect them as the subjects of manufacture or production or as articles of commerce". Hence, although the tax in this case did not directly refer to the quantity or value of the chicory produced, the land area has a "natural, although not a necessary" relation to the quantity produced, and it is a "controlling element". This was formulated with reference to the framers of the Constitution, who adopted an excise as "a tax directly affecting commodities".".
- Q6791501 thumbnail Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300.
- Q6791501 wikiPageExternalLink 38.html.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q1144614.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q1358798.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q15513909.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q159579.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q19878825.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q21.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q2544599.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q364253.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q36687.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q4824869.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q5153807.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q5344419.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q5543840.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q5546455.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q5686389.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q6994766.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q6994780.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q7178286.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q783373.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q8138055.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q8276803.
- Q6791501 wikiPageWikiLink Q8565306.
- Q6791501 comment "Template:Infobox court caseMatthews v Chicory Marketing Board (Vic) (1938) 60 CLR 263 is a High Court of Australia case that considered section 90 of the Australian Constitution, which prohibits States from levying excise (taxes).".
- Q6791501 label "Matthews v Chicory Marketing Board (Vic)".
- Q6791501 depiction Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg.