Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6680248> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6680248 subject Q6904101.
- Q6680248 subject Q7061998.
- Q6680248 subject Q7779978.
- Q6680248 subject Q8249933.
- Q6680248 subject Q8264296.
- Q6680248 subject Q8289318.
- Q6680248 subject Q8366916.
- Q6680248 abstract "The "lordship salvation" controversy (also "Lordship Controversy") is a theological dispute regarding key soteriological questions within Evangelical Christianity, involving some non-denominational and Evangelical churches in North America since at least the 1980s. The dispute spawned several books, pamphlets, and conferences."By grace alone" and "By faith alone" are two of the so-called "Five Solas" of the Protestant Reformation (see five solae). While many Protestants affirm these phrases as Protestant distinctives, the Lordship Salvation controversy concerns what grace and faith must include, and what they must exclude, for a person to "have salvation" in the evangelical Protestant sense. The language of what must be included permeates the whole debate and is often transferred from the meaning of the concepts to the status of someone's experience: thus, "As a part of his saving work, God will produce repentance, faith, sanctification, yieldedness, obedience, and ultimately glorification. Since he is not dependent on human effort in producing these elements, an experience that lacks any of them cannot be the saving work of God." Related to the issue of what must be included or not, the debate also looks at conversion using 'accepting Christ as ...' language. This is how the term Lordship became associated with the debate, by discussions of various ways to accept Christ: sometimes 'accepting Christ as Savior,' or 'accepting Christ as Lord', was distinguished, and a debate ensued. This is reflected in various modern translations: taking a cue from Colossians 2:6 in the Good News Bible, which has "accept" for what is to be done about Christ. In the New International Version of the same verse the word "receive" is used. Thus, a common question was "do (or did) you accept (or "receive") Christ as Lord?" Whether this "part" is, or was, included, or not, became the issue defining the controversy.Given the accepting-as phraseology of the popular GNB of Colossians 2:6, and the receiving-as phraseology in the widely popular NIV of Colossians 2:6, an exegesis based on the NIV, for example, offered an explanation of what manner of receiving this was. John F. MacArthur Jr, in turn, taught that such a receiving was both non-passive toward Christ and actively submissive to Christ, offering this as a way of understanding the English idiom, of what receiving a person "as" Lord, really means.Yet the "as Lord" language was not the only metaphor of the controversy. In 1959, Eternity Magazine featured a twin set of articles which ignited the debate and the use of the idiom from the titles: what Christ must "be." This asked what Christ must "be" to the one accepting Christ: must he "be Lord" in order to "be Savior," both, etc. Ten years later (1969), Charles Ryrie used this idiom in a chapter title, verbatim, quoting exactly the title of the articles in Eternity Magazine, September, 1959. This idiom, what Christ must "be", was used to derive and discuss the implications for salvation associated with what Christ is. One author, Arthur W. Pink (1886–1952), had already associated Christ's Lordship with surrendering to it as a sine qua non at the initial point. Therefore the controversy dates back to before 1959, to at least before 1953 in the case of Pink, and shows the subject's connection to evangelism. This should not be considered a modern issue, as Baptist theologian John Gill in his 18th-century work in exposition of Colossians 2:6 deals with an emphasis on Lordship.In 1988, John F. MacArthur Jr published the first edition of "The Gospel According to Jesus". By defining salvation by what it produces and what salvation will not fail to produce, (not only glorification, but good works, repentance, faith, sanctification, yieldedness, and obedience) the book not only heavily spread the extent of the debate, but the debate expanded in scope, from questions about conversion issues, to questions about what is also necessary, and who it is who does what, throughout the Christian life. Using surrender language in the gospel became another issue.Free Grace theology became an umbrella term for a variety of opposing or contrasting positions, sometimes arguing that Lordship salvation was legalistic, sometimes more opposed to it than that, for example, faulting it for not being specific about what degree, quality, and current visibility there must be to the necessary obedience. The controversy continues to be debated not only in discussions about all the gospels, but also in discussions about almost any of the Pauline epistles and the relationship of Paul the Apostle and Judaism, and the rest of the New Testament, as well as much material about salvation in topical studies, and in systematic theology.".
- Q6680248 wikiPageExternalLink lordship-1.htm.
- Q6680248 wikiPageExternalLink J23-99a.htm.
- Q6680248 wikiPageExternalLink 2263.
- Q6680248 wikiPageExternalLink Lordship_Salvation.pdf.
- Q6680248 wikiPageExternalLink Lordship-of-Christ.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q101849.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q10337407.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q1050725.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q1200072.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q13446873.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q1595462.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q162593.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q184186.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q18813.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q1933884.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q194253.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q1967726.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q216545.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q2424878.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q262617.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q2632580.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q265283.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q310355.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q310428.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q316560.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q3240738.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q42332.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q4384645.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q447638.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5043.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5082634.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5115734.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5224587.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5402773.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5499862.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5582831.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5591165.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q5973650.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q639174.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q6423963.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q653345.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q6904101.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q7061998.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q760793.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q7779978.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q786471.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q7882536.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q8018.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q8066097.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q8073886.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q8249933.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q8264296.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q8289318.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q8366916.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q8451511.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q861982.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q875490.
- Q6680248 wikiPageWikiLink Q956444.
- Q6680248 comment "The "lordship salvation" controversy (also "Lordship Controversy") is a theological dispute regarding key soteriological questions within Evangelical Christianity, involving some non-denominational and Evangelical churches in North America since at least the 1980s. The dispute spawned several books, pamphlets, and conferences."By grace alone" and "By faith alone" are two of the so-called "Five Solas" of the Protestant Reformation (see five solae).".
- Q6680248 label "Lordship salvation controversy".