Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6068883> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6068883 subject Q6197288.
- Q6068883 subject Q7482146.
- Q6068883 subject Q8851925.
- Q6068883 abstract "The Irenaean theodicy is a Christian theodicy designed to respond to the problem of evil. As such, it defends the probability of an omnipotent and omnibenevolent (all-powerful and perfectly loving) God in the face of evidence of evil in the world. Numerous variations of theodicy have been proposed which all maintain that, while evil exists, God is either not responsible for creating evil, or he is not guilty for creating evil. Typically, the Irenaean theodicy asserts that the world is the best of all possible worlds because it allows humans to fully develop. Most versions of the Irenaean theodicy propose that creation is incomplete, as humans are not yet fully developed, and experiencing evil and suffering is necessary for such development.Second-century philosopher and theologian Irenaeus, after whom the theodicy is named, proposed a two-stage creation process in which humans require free will and the experience of evil to develop. Another early Christian theologian, Origen, presented a response to the problem of evil which cast the world as a schoolroom or hospital for the soul; theologian Mark Scott has argued that Origen, rather than Irenaeus, ought to be considered the father of this kind of theodicy. Friedrich Schleiermacher argued in the nineteenth century that God must necessarily create flawlessly, so this world must be the best possible world because it allows God's purposes to be naturally fulfilled. In 1966, philosopher John Hick discussed the similarities of the preceding theodicies, calling them all "Irenaean". He supported the view that creation is incomplete and argued that the world is best placed for the full moral development of humans, as it presents genuine moral choices. British philosopher Richard Swinburne proposed that, to make a free moral choice, humans must have experience of the consequences of their own actions and that natural evil must exist to provide such choices.The development of process theology has challenged the Irenaean tradition by teaching that God's power is limited and that he cannot be responsible for evil. Twentieth century philosopher Alvin Plantinga supported the idea that this world is the best possible world, arguing that the good in the world (including God's infinite goodness) outweighs the evil and proposing that the ultimate good of God's sacrifice when Jesus was crucified necessitated the existence of evil. His free will defence was not a theodicy because he was trying to show the logical compatibility of evil and the existence of God, rather than the probability of God. D. Z. Phillips and Fyodor Dostoyevsky challenged the instrumental use of suffering, suggesting that love cannot be expressed through suffering. However, Dostoyevsky also states that the beauty of love is evident, in that love can continue to grow, withstand and overcome even the most evil acts. Michael Tooley argued that the magnitude of suffering is excessive and that, in some cases, cannot lead to moral development. French theologian Henri Blocher criticised Hick's universalism, arguing that such a view negates free will, which was similarly important to the theodicy.".
- Q6068883 thumbnail Saint_Irenaeus.jpg?width=300.
- Q6068883 wikiPageExternalLink Against_Heresies:_Book_I.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q1062821.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q1063.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q1135949.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q1141803.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q1217908.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q1261111.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q1277683.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q131133.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q14949641.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q1538955.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q170472.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q178819.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q182123.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q183157.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q184186.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q18535.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q2468262.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q259513.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q276183.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q2763.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q3025590.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q3130696.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q3360416.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q355201.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q37085.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q42040.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q4821250.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q521358.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q531931.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q560566.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q567888.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q58701.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q6197288.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q6843150.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q7090353.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q712709.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q7482146.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q76576.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q82083.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q8851925.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q9184.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q9190.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q9471.
- Q6068883 wikiPageWikiLink Q991.
- Q6068883 comment "The Irenaean theodicy is a Christian theodicy designed to respond to the problem of evil. As such, it defends the probability of an omnipotent and omnibenevolent (all-powerful and perfectly loving) God in the face of evidence of evil in the world. Numerous variations of theodicy have been proposed which all maintain that, while evil exists, God is either not responsible for creating evil, or he is not guilty for creating evil.".
- Q6068883 label "Irenaean theodicy".
- Q6068883 depiction Saint_Irenaeus.jpg.