Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q6046138> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 triples per page.
- Q6046138 subject Q16785945.
- Q6046138 subject Q6416472.
- Q6046138 subject Q6462842.
- Q6046138 subject Q7451599.
- Q6046138 subject Q7461835.
- Q6046138 subject Q8380095.
- Q6046138 subject Q8966831.
- Q6046138 abstract "Interdiscourse is the implicit or explicit relations that a discourse has to other discourses. Interdiscursivity is the aspect of a discourse that relates it to other discourses. Norman Fairclough prefers the concept "orders of discourse". Interdiscursivity is often mostly an analytic concept, e.g. in Foucault and Fairclough. Interdiscursivity has close affinity to recontextualisation because interdiscourse often implies that elements are imported from another discourse.The meaning of interdiscourse varies. It denotes at least three levels: In Courtine interdiscursivity means that a discourse has a relation to another discourse. That is, a meaning which is close to the meaning of intertextuality. In Norman Fairclough and Linell interdiscursive denotes relations between types of discourse such as genres. In Michel Foucault and Marc Angenot, interdiscursive denotes relations between discursive formations, that is, between large heterogeneous discursive entities, such as natural history and political economy during enlightenment. In Michel Foucault, interdiscourse is differences and equalities across discursive formations.An example (where 1. corresponds to a., etc.) illustrates the three levels: A minister of environment speaks in the parliament about a proposal.a. She refers to other specific speeches in the parliament about the proposal.b. She refers to a memorandum from her civil servants.c. She refers to scientific reports supporting the proposal.The example illustrates that 2. and 3. are specific cases of 1, in the sense a-c all relate to another discourse. To avoid this, level 1. might be defined as relations to other discourses within the same discursive formation and type of discourse. Consequently, the definition of the levels depends on the definition of discursive formation and types of discourse, and the three levels may collapse to the extent that these concepts are not conceived. In short, the stratification of interdiscourse depends on the stratification of discourse.".
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q1129466.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q16785945.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q182034.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q185375.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q190539.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q25107.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q3287758.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q3559868.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q44272.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q6416472.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q6462842.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q667404.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q709027.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q7257.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q7302801.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q7451599.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q7461835.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q8380095.
- Q6046138 wikiPageWikiLink Q8966831.
- Q6046138 comment "Interdiscourse is the implicit or explicit relations that a discourse has to other discourses. Interdiscursivity is the aspect of a discourse that relates it to other discourses. Norman Fairclough prefers the concept "orders of discourse". Interdiscursivity is often mostly an analytic concept, e.g. in Foucault and Fairclough.".
- Q6046138 label "Interdiscourse".