Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q5816782> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 41 of
41
with 100 triples per page.
- Q5816782 subject Q6996651.
- Q5816782 subject Q6997051.
- Q5816782 subject Q8412480.
- Q5816782 subject Q8449027.
- Q5816782 subject Q8623731.
- Q5816782 subject Q8797717.
- Q5816782 abstract "Eaton vs. Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad (B., C. & M.R.R.) was a New Hampshire Supreme Court case decided in 1872 between farmer Ezra B. Eaton and the railroad company. Eaton asked the court to decide if B., C. & M.R.R. flooding of his farm was considered a "taking" under the Fifth Amendment's eminent domain clause, and if the railroad was responsible for compensation to the farmer for the taking. The court asked if "a release of all damages on account of the laying out or construction of a railroad through and over the land of the releasor, does not cover damages occasioned to the remaining land of the releasor by the construction of the railroad over the land of other persons". In 1851, after construction of the railroad, Eaton gave the defendants a warranty deed for the part of his farm where the railroad was located and signed the following release: "I, the subscriber, do hereby acknowledge that I have received of the Boston, Concord, & Montreal Railroad the sum of two hundred and seventy-five dollars, in full for the amount of damages assessed to me by the railroad commissioners of the State of New Hampshire, in conjunction with the selectmen of Wentworth, on account of the laying out of the said Boston, Concord, & Montreal Railroad through and over my land; and I do hereby release and discharge the said corporation from said damages".The case deals with the legal concepts of eminent domain and strict liability (which received attention as a result of the need to address new and expanding issues created by the emergence and growth of railroads in the United States during the nineteenth century), and occupies a significant place in the historical background of eminent-domain and property-rights cases which emerged with the development of the railroads.".
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q105190.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q13360049.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q1342.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q1397.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q1500063.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q160070.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q166332.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q1772250.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q179444.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q205077.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q2306396.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q2358778.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q240340.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q3001117.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q30216.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q3433515.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q4444755.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q4850012.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q4915.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q5388351.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q643284.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q686021.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996651.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997051.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q705497.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q7309709.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q7969960.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q8412480.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q8449027.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q8623731.
- Q5816782 wikiPageWikiLink Q8797717.
- Q5816782 comment "Eaton vs. Boston, Concord & Montreal Railroad (B., C. & M.R.R.) was a New Hampshire Supreme Court case decided in 1872 between farmer Ezra B. Eaton and the railroad company. Eaton asked the court to decide if B., C. & M.R.R. flooding of his farm was considered a "taking" under the Fifth Amendment's eminent domain clause, and if the railroad was responsible for compensation to the farmer for the taking.".
- Q5816782 label "Eaton v. Boston, Concord & Montreal Rail Road".