Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q5547969> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 35 of
35
with 100 triples per page.
- Q5547969 subject Q13241292.
- Q5547969 subject Q6996306.
- Q5547969 subject Q6996385.
- Q5547969 subject Q6997720.
- Q5547969 subject Q6998984.
- Q5547969 subject Q8488605.
- Q5547969 subject Q8520341.
- Q5547969 abstract "Georgia v. Ashcroft, 539 U.S. 461 (2003), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court found that a three-judge federal district court panel did not consider all of the requisite relevant factors when it examined whether the 2001 Georgia State Senate redistricting plan resulted in retrogression of black voters’ effective exercise of the electoral franchise in contravention of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Section 5, which only applies to those states or political subdivisions that are considered “covered” under Section 4(b) of the VRA, requires that before any change in voting procedure can take effect, it must be precleared by the federal government by a demonstration that the change would not "lead to a retrogression in the position of racial minorities with respect to their effective exercise of the electoral franchise.” The Court held that the district court analysis was incorrect “because it focused too heavily on the ability of the minority group to elect a candidate of its choice in the [safe] districts,” without giving proper consideration to other factors such as the state’s creation of additional influence and coalition districts. Accordingly, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the case to the district court to examine the facts using the new standard announced in its opinion.".
- Q5547969 wikiPageExternalLink 02-182.ZS.html.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q13241292.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q1494569.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q15147983.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q1608064.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q3245988.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996385.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997720.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998984.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q7305983.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889769.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q7983783.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q8488605.
- Q5547969 wikiPageWikiLink Q8520341.
- Q5547969 fullname "Georgia, Appellant v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al.".
- Q5547969 type Case.
- Q5547969 type LegalCase.
- Q5547969 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q5547969 type UnitOfWork.
- Q5547969 type Situation.
- Q5547969 type Thing.
- Q5547969 type Q2334719.
- Q5547969 comment "Georgia v. Ashcroft, 539 U.S. 461 (2003), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court found that a three-judge federal district court panel did not consider all of the requisite relevant factors when it examined whether the 2001 Georgia State Senate redistricting plan resulted in retrogression of black voters’ effective exercise of the electoral franchise in contravention of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.".
- Q5547969 label "Georgia v. Ashcroft".
- Q5547969 name "Georgia, Appellant v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al.".