Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q5370152> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 triples per page.
- Q5370152 subject Q7023064.
- Q5370152 subject Q8394243.
- Q5370152 subject Q8416298.
- Q5370152 subject Q8586683.
- Q5370152 abstract "Embracery is the attempt to influence a juror corruptly to give his or her verdict in favour of one side or the other in a trial, by promise, persuasions, entreaties, money, entertainments and the like.In English law, it was an offence both at common law and by statute, punishable by fine and imprisonment. As a statutory offence it dates back to 1360. The offence is complete, whether any verdict has been given or not, and whether the verdict is in accordance with the weight of evidence or otherwise. The person making the attempt, and any juryman who consents, are equally punishable.The legal term "embracery" comes from the Old Fr. embraseour, an embracer, i.e., one who excites or instigates, literally one who sets on fire, from embraser, to kindle a fire. This is unrelated to the common word "embrace", i.e., to hold or clasp in the arms, which is from French embracer, from Latin bracchia, arms.The false verdict of a jury, whether occasioned by embracery or otherwise, was formerly considered criminal, and jurors were severely punished, being proceeded against by writ of attaint. The Juries Act 1825, in abolishing writs of attaint, made a special exemption as regards jurors guilty of embracery (s.61). Prosecution for the offence has been so extremely rare that when a case occurred in 1891 it was stated that no precedent could be found for the indictment. The defendant was fined £200, afterwards reduced to £100.By 2010 the offence was regarded as obsolescent and such misconduct more likely to be charged as perverting the course of justice. The last conviction for embracery in the UK was at Caernarvon Crown Court in November 1975 but it was quashed by the Court of Appeal the following year on the initiative of Lord Justice Lawton, who said that the offence was obsolescent. The offence was abolished by section 17 of the Bribery Act 2010, as from 1 July 2011.In the United States, embracery prosecutions have occurred as recently as 1989, when a county commissioner in Georgia was sentenced to a fine and probation.".
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q10858400.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q1138780.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q13370881.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q150.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q176763.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q2842797.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q30216.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q329525.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q35222.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q397.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q572817.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q600751.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q6315498.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q7023064.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q703934.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q8016240.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q8038378.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q820655.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q837675.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q8394243.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q841236.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q8416298.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q8586683.
- Q5370152 wikiPageWikiLink Q913344.
- Q5370152 comment "Embracery is the attempt to influence a juror corruptly to give his or her verdict in favour of one side or the other in a trial, by promise, persuasions, entreaties, money, entertainments and the like.In English law, it was an offence both at common law and by statute, punishable by fine and imprisonment. As a statutory offence it dates back to 1360.".
- Q5370152 label "Embracery".