Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q5165105> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 triples per page.
- Q5165105 subject Q6613461.
- Q5165105 subject Q6898042.
- Q5165105 subject Q7458991.
- Q5165105 subject Q8011345.
- Q5165105 abstract "Contentious politics is the use of disruptive techniques to make a political point, or to change government policy. Examples of such techniques are actions that disturb the normal activities of society such as demonstrations, general strike action, riot, terrorism, civil disobedience, and even revolution or insurrection. Social movements often engage in contentious politics. The concept distinguishes these forms of contention from the everyday acts of resistance explored by James C. Scott, interstate warfare, and forms of contention employed entirely within institutional settings, such as elections or sports. Historical sociologist Charles Tilly defines contentious politics as "interactions in which actors make claims bearing on someone else's interest, in which governments appear either as targets, initiators of claims, or third parties."Contentious politics has existed forever, but its form varies over time and space. For example, Tilly argues that the nature of contentious politics changed fairly dramatically with the birth of social movements in 18th-century Europe. The concept of contentious politics was developed throughout the 1990s and into the 21st century by its most prominent scholars in the United States: Sidney Tarrow, Charles Tilly, and Doug McAdam. Until its development, the study of contentious politics was divided among a number of traditions each of which were concerned with the description and explanation of different contentious political phenomena, especially the social movement, the strike, and revolution. One of the primary goals of these three authors was to advance the explanation of these phenomena and other contentious politics under a single research agenda. There remains a significant plurality of agendas in addition to the one these three propose.".
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q10931.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q124734.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q124757.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q15734679.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q175331.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q3025403.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q333686.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q3483342.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q47217.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q49773.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q49776.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q5300708.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q6613461.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q6898042.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q7163.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q717635.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q7283.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q7458991.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q7550726.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q7551260.
- Q5165105 wikiPageWikiLink Q8011345.
- Q5165105 comment "Contentious politics is the use of disruptive techniques to make a political point, or to change government policy. Examples of such techniques are actions that disturb the normal activities of society such as demonstrations, general strike action, riot, terrorism, civil disobedience, and even revolution or insurrection. Social movements often engage in contentious politics. The concept distinguishes these forms of contention from the everyday acts of resistance explored by James C.".
- Q5165105 label "Contentious politics".