Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q5161756> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 15 of
15
with 100 triples per page.
- Q5161756 subject Q6995607.
- Q5161756 subject Q6996184.
- Q5161756 subject Q8153164.
- Q5161756 abstract "Connelly v DPP [1964] was a landmark trial in the United Kingdom where the House of Lords ruled regarding double jeopardy in British law. It was ruled that criminal proceedings could be stayed if an "abuse of process" violated the "standards of fairness" and hampered the rights of the defendant. Connelly had been tried for murder, while in the commission of a robbery, and was found guilty despite a defence revolving around a lack of intent for murder. Connelly's case was then heard at the Court of Appeal, where his conviction was overturned and Connelly was acquitted of murder and instead indicted for robbery. Connelly pleaded autrefois acquit, or double jeopardy, however argument was rejected and he was convicted. It was ruled that the offences of murder while committing robbery, and robbery, differed enough "in fact and in law" for double jeopardy to not apply.".
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q11007.
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q132821.
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q145.
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q5253920.
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q53706.
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q6995607.
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996184.
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q8016240.
- Q5161756 wikiPageWikiLink Q8153164.
- Q5161756 comment "Connelly v DPP [1964] was a landmark trial in the United Kingdom where the House of Lords ruled regarding double jeopardy in British law. It was ruled that criminal proceedings could be stayed if an "abuse of process" violated the "standards of fairness" and hampered the rights of the defendant. Connelly had been tried for murder, while in the commission of a robbery, and was found guilty despite a defence revolving around a lack of intent for murder.".
- Q5161756 label "Connelly v DPP".