Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q4850623> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 triples per page.
- Q4850623 subject Q6996306.
- Q4850623 subject Q6998653.
- Q4850623 abstract "Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 294 U.S. 511 (1935), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a state may not regulate intrastate prices by prohibiting the importation of less expensive goods in interstate commerce. It established the principle that one state, in its dealings with another, cannot place itself in economic isolation.".
- Q4850623 wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=us&vol=294&invol=511.
- Q4850623 wikiPageExternalLink 511.
- Q4850623 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q4850623 wikiPageExternalLink USSC_CR_0294_0511_ZO.html.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q11144.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q11268.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q16551.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q17349491.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q1956113.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q3270268.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q48416.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q49669.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q60.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998653.
- Q4850623 wikiPageWikiLink Q817637.
- Q4850623 fullname "Baldwin, Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets, et al. v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.".
- Q4850623 type Case.
- Q4850623 type LegalCase.
- Q4850623 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q4850623 type UnitOfWork.
- Q4850623 type Situation.
- Q4850623 type Thing.
- Q4850623 type Q2334719.
- Q4850623 comment "Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 294 U.S. 511 (1935), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a state may not regulate intrastate prices by prohibiting the importation of less expensive goods in interstate commerce. It established the principle that one state, in its dealings with another, cannot place itself in economic isolation.".
- Q4850623 label "Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc.".
- Q4850623 name "Baldwin, Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets, et al. v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.".