Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q4661000> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 13 of
13
with 100 triples per page.
- Q4661000 subject Q6995634.
- Q4661000 subject Q6996184.
- Q4661000 subject Q8195524.
- Q4661000 abstract "A v Hoare, [2008] UKHL 6, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords. Their Lordships held that the limitation period for actions founded on torts of negligence may be disapplied where it is inequitable to enforce it. This case centred on the wording of the Limitation Act 1980, which created an exception to the three year limitation period for 'any action for damages for negligence, nuisance or breach of duty.' In the earlier case, Stubbings v Webb [1993] AC 498, S v W [1995] FLR 862, the words 'negligence, nuisance or breach of duty' were construed in such a way as to exclude sexual assault. Stubbings v Webb was criticised as being unfair to claimants, notably by the Law Commission. A v Hoare overruled the judgment of the House of Lords in Stubbings v Webb in favour of what the judges considered to be a fairer approach.".
- Q4661000 wikiPageWikiLink Q11007.
- Q4661000 wikiPageWikiLink Q1137751.
- Q4661000 wikiPageWikiLink Q158970.
- Q4661000 wikiPageWikiLink Q6044482.
- Q4661000 wikiPageWikiLink Q6995634.
- Q4661000 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996184.
- Q4661000 wikiPageWikiLink Q8195524.
- Q4661000 comment "A v Hoare, [2008] UKHL 6, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords. Their Lordships held that the limitation period for actions founded on torts of negligence may be disapplied where it is inequitable to enforce it.".
- Q4661000 label "A v Hoare".