Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q3797381> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 triples per page.
- Q3797381 subject Q6996306.
- Q3797381 subject Q6996773.
- Q3797381 subject Q6997078.
- Q3797381 subject Q6998836.
- Q3797381 subject Q8585475.
- Q3797381 abstract "In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that when a juvenile is charged with an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult, every element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, not preponderance of the evidence. The case has come to stand for a broader proposition, however: in a criminal prosecution, every essential element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. See, e.g., Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 477 (2000); Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 278 (1993).".
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q188116.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q2905670.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q30.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q4781695.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q5312127.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602449.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996773.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997078.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998836.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q8585475.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q9012745.
- Q3797381 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q3797381 fullname "In the Matter of Samuel Winship, Appellant".
- Q3797381 type Case.
- Q3797381 type LegalCase.
- Q3797381 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q3797381 type UnitOfWork.
- Q3797381 type Situation.
- Q3797381 type Thing.
- Q3797381 type Q2334719.
- Q3797381 comment "In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that when a juvenile is charged with an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult, every element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, not preponderance of the evidence. The case has come to stand for a broader proposition, however: in a criminal prosecution, every essential element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. See, e.g., Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.".
- Q3797381 label "In re Winship".
- Q3797381 name "In the Matter of Samuel Winship, Appellant".