Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q3577283> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 86 of
86
with 100 triples per page.
- Q3577283 subject Q5618970.
- Q3577283 subject Q6991285.
- Q3577283 subject Q6996226.
- Q3577283 subject Q6997521.
- Q3577283 subject Q6997866.
- Q3577283 subject Q6997985.
- Q3577283 subject Q7001062.
- Q3577283 subject Q8519822.
- Q3577283 subject Q8520259.
- Q3577283 subject Q8586782.
- Q3577283 abstract "The Lochner era is a period in American legal history in which the Supreme Court of the United States is said to have made it a common practice "to strike down economic regulations adopted by a State based on the Court’s own notions of the most appropriate means for the State to implement its considered policies," by using its intrepretation of substantive due process to strike down laws held to be infringing on economic liberty or private contract rights. The era takes its name from a 1905 case, Lochner v. New York. The beginning of the era is usually marked earlier, with the Court's decision in Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897), and its end marked forty years later in the case of West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937), which overturned an earlier Lochner-era decision.The Supreme Court during the Lochner era has been described as "play[ing] a judicially activist but politically conservative role." The Court sometimes invalidated state and federal legislation that inhibited business or otherwise limited the free market, including laws on minimum wage, federal (but not state) child labor laws, regulations of banking, insurance and transportation industries. Originating in the late 19th century, the Lochner era carried into the mid-1930s, when the Court's tendency to invalidate labor and market regulations came into direct conflict with Congress' regulatory efforts in the New Deal.Since the 1930s, Lochner has been widely discredited as a product of a "bygone era". Robert Bork called Lochner "the symbol, indeed the quintessence, of judicial usurpation of power". In his confirmation hearings to become Chief Justice, John Roberts said, "You go to a case like the Lochner case, you can read that opinion today and it's quite clear that they're not interpreting the law, they're making the law," concluding that the Lochner court substituted its own judgment for the legislature's findings.".
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q1074679.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q11153.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q11268.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q1137223.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q1184466.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q119184.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q1223.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q1330176.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q1365125.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q1365780.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q17108405.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q171990.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q17349491.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q178790.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q18389196.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q186356.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q186539.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q187117.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q188116.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q1926346.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q2174811.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q240340.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q29556.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q30216.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q3257729.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q326498.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q361.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q399963.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q452445.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q459752.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q46607.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q4678477.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q4680484.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q4683240.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q4732246.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q4777178.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q4848400.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q5047227.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q5168663.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q5231367.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q5312127.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q5315943.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q536633.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q5618970.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q5645676.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q5868038.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q61.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q6302931.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q6689493.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q680004.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q6984554.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q6991285.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996226.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997521.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997866.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997985.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q7001062.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q703968.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q7191839.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q7323685.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q7632092.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q7893237.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q7893240.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q7984802.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q8007.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q839447.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q8519822.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q8520259.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q8586782.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q9004199.
- Q3577283 wikiPageWikiLink Q956164.
- Q3577283 type Thing.
- Q3577283 comment "The Lochner era is a period in American legal history in which the Supreme Court of the United States is said to have made it a common practice "to strike down economic regulations adopted by a State based on the Court’s own notions of the most appropriate means for the State to implement its considered policies," by using its intrepretation of substantive due process to strike down laws held to be infringing on economic liberty or private contract rights.".
- Q3577283 label "Lochner era".