Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q2900682> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 100 of
100
with 100 triples per page.
- Q2900682 subject Q15618602.
- Q2900682 subject Q7006672.
- Q2900682 subject Q7320183.
- Q2900682 subject Q8246480.
- Q2900682 subject Q8417317.
- Q2900682 subject Q8585389.
- Q2900682 subject Q8586648.
- Q2900682 subject Q8586652.
- Q2900682 subject Q8586806.
- Q2900682 subject Q8718669.
- Q2900682 subject Q8733984.
- Q2900682 subject Q8819523.
- Q2900682 abstract "Template:ForIn law, a reasonable person (historically reasonable man) or The man on the Clapham omnibus is a hypothetical person of legal fiction whose is ultimately an anthropomorphic representation of the body care standards crafted by the courts and communicated through case law and jury instructions. Strictly according to the fiction, it is misconceived for a party to seek evidence from actual people in order to establish how the reasonable man would have acted or what he would have foreseen. This person's character and care conduct under any common set of facts, is decided through reasoning of good practice or policy—or "learned" permitting there is a compelling consensus of public opinion—by high courts. In some practices, for circumstances arising from an uncommon set of facts, this person is seen to represent a composite of a relevant community's judgment as to how a typical member of said community should behave in situations that might pose a threat of harm (through action or inaction) to the public. However, cases resulting in judgment notwithstanding verdict, such as Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, can be examples where a vetted jury's composite judgment were deemed outside that of the actual fictional reasonable person, and thus overruled.The reasonable person belongs to a family of hypothetical figures in law including: the "right-thinking member of society," the "officious bystander," the "reasonable parent," the "reasonable landlord," the "fair-minded and informed observer," and stretching back to Roman jurists, the figure of the bonus paterfamilias, all used to define legal standards. While there is loose consensus in black letter law, there is no accepted technical definition. As with legal fiction in general, it is somewhat susceptible to ad hoc manipulation or transformation, and hence the "reasonable person" is an emergent concept of common law. The "reasonable person" is used as a tool to standardize, teach law students, or explain the law to a jury.As a legal fiction, the "reasonable person" is not an average person or a typical person, leading to great difficulties in applying the concept in some criminal cases, especially in regards to the partial defence of provocation. The standard also holds that each person owes a duty to behave as a reasonable person would under the same or similar circumstances. While the specific circumstances of each case will require varying kinds of conduct and degrees of care, the reasonable person standard undergoes no variation itself. The "reasonable person" construct can be found applied in many areas of the law. The standard performs a crucial role in determining negligence in both criminal law—that is, criminal negligence—and tort law.The standard also has a presence in contract law, though its use there is substantially different. It is used to determine contractual intent, or if a breach of the standard of care has occurred, provided a duty of care can be proven. The intent of a party can be determined by examining the understanding of a reasonable person, after consideration is given to all relevant circumstances of the case including the negotiations, any practices the parties have established between themselves, usages and any subsequent conduct of the parties.The standard does not exist independently of other circumstances within a case that could affect an individual's judgment.".
- Q2900682 wikiPageExternalLink reasonable-woman.
- Q2900682 wikiPageExternalLink what-is-a-prudent-lay-person.
- Q2900682 wikiPageExternalLink abstract=1883208.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q1054131.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q11063.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q1138780.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q1144694.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q11640551.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q1195493.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q129218.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q132821.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q132987.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q146491.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q1538155.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q155736.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q15618602.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q158970.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q159394.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q160070.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q163366.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q16518.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q170790.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q17165132.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q1768566.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q185351.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q192683.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q1960297.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q1996422.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q20012.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q21.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q21201.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q22713653.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q2732142.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q2905670.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q2909867.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q30.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q30216.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q3039817.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q3188085.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q360574.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q40348.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q4352362.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q47092.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q4922364.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q4930871.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q493155.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q4959115.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q5165703.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q529755.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q529781.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q5354219.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q548265.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q5922194.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q5950118.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q6502501.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q6511.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q665141.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q6807916.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q6882.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q6987384.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7006672.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7014803.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7079618.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7167387.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7320183.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q751722.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7598360.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7777067.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7893241.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7901769.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q7917333.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8246480.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q837675.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8417317.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q845694.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8585389.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8586648.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8586652.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8586806.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8718669.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8733984.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q8819523.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q931483.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q93200.
- Q2900682 wikiPageWikiLink Q93288.
- Q2900682 comment "Template:ForIn law, a reasonable person (historically reasonable man) or The man on the Clapham omnibus is a hypothetical person of legal fiction whose is ultimately an anthropomorphic representation of the body care standards crafted by the courts and communicated through case law and jury instructions.".
- Q2900682 label "Reasonable person".