Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q2496491> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 27 of
27
with 100 triples per page.
- Q2496491 subject Q8134663.
- Q2496491 subject Q8617302.
- Q2496491 subject Q8718395.
- Q2496491 abstract "Univocity of being is the idea that words describing the properties of God mean the same thing as when they apply to people or things, even if God is vastly different in kind. In medieval disputes over the nature of God, many theologians and philosophers (such as Thomas Aquinas) held that when one says that "God is good", God's goodness is only analogous to human goodness. John Duns Scotus argued to the contrary that when one says that "God is good", the goodness in question is exactly the same sort of goodness that is meant when one says "Jane is good". That is, God only differs from us in degree, and properties such as goodness, power, reason, and so forth are "univocally" applied, regardless of whether one is talking about God, a man, or a flea.Gilles Deleuze borrowed the doctrine of ontological univocity from Scotus. He claimed that being is univocal, i.e., that all of its senses are affirmed in one voice. Deleuze adapts the doctrine of univocity to claim that being is, univocally, difference. "With univocity, however, it is not the differences which are and must be: it is being which is Difference, in the sense that it is said of difference. Moreover, it is not we who are univocal in a Being which is not; it is we and our individuality which remains equivocal in and for a univocal Being."Deleuze at once echoes and inverts Spinoza, who maintained that everything that exists is a modification of the one substance, God or Nature. He claims that it is the organizing principle of the Dutchman's philosophy, despite the absence of the term from any of Spinoza's works. For Deleuze, there is no one substance, only an always-differentiating process, an origami cosmos, always folding, unfolding, refolding. Deleuze and Guattari summarize this ontology in the paradoxical formula "pluralism = monism".".
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q10797504.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q15548074.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q178354.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q178801.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q184226.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q190.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q190089.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q2114360.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q25107.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q326894.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q352465.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q35802.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q44325.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q464595.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q7860.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q8134663.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q8617302.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q868437.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q8718395.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q879021.
- Q2496491 wikiPageWikiLink Q9438.
- Q2496491 comment "Univocity of being is the idea that words describing the properties of God mean the same thing as when they apply to people or things, even if God is vastly different in kind. In medieval disputes over the nature of God, many theologians and philosophers (such as Thomas Aquinas) held that when one says that "God is good", God's goodness is only analogous to human goodness.".
- Q2496491 label "Univocity of being".