Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q22909362> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 triples per page.
- Q22909362 subject Q6996208.
- Q22909362 subject Q8429828.
- Q22909362 subject Q8458575.
- Q22909362 subject Q8465729.
- Q22909362 abstract "The Public Prosecution Service v William Elliott and Robert McKee [2013] UKSC 32 is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom concerning admissibility of electronic evidence obtained from an electronic fingerprint reader unit that had not been approved by the Secretary of State as required by Article 61(8)(b) of the Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989.On the 6th October 2007 William Elliott and Robert McKee were arrested and charged for theft of building materials. Elliott’s left thumbprint, which had been recorded by the Livescan electronic fingerprint reader, matched a print that had been found on the packaging of the stolen materials. Both Elliott and McKee were convicted and sentenced to 8 months imprisonment. The defendants appealed the ruling on the basis that the fingerprint evidence was not admissible, as the device used to record the fingerprints was not an approved device; they were subsequently acquitted. The Public Prosecution Service appealed the acquittal, which was then reversed by the Court of Appeal.Elliott and McKee subsequently appealed to the UKSC, which concluded that Court of Appeal decision was correct and dismissed the appeal.Template:Infobox court case".
- Q22909362 thumbnail MxGuildhallMay09.JPG?width=300.
- Q22909362 wikiPageExternalLink 3m-cogent-uk-mobile-id-case-study.pdf?fn=UKMobileID_CaseStudy_A4_screen.p.
- Q22909362 wikiPageExternalLink Law_Enforcement.
- Q22909362 wikiPageExternalLink Livescan_Solutions.
- Q22909362 wikiPageExternalLink UKSC_2012_0007_Judgment.pdf.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q1004085.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q1122261.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q1164504.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q14214.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q1482170.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q1703244.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q17511526.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q21.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q2352893.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q25.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q26.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q30216.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q335930.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q4772755.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q5276084.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q5280558.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q6303012.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q6658074.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996208.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q7209551.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q7209552.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q7209656.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q7257503.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q7302868.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q7379041.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q8429828.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q8458575.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q8465729.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q852633.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q908568.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q912458.
- Q22909362 wikiPageWikiLink Q986172.
- Q22909362 comment "The Public Prosecution Service v William Elliott and Robert McKee [2013] UKSC 32 is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom concerning admissibility of electronic evidence obtained from an electronic fingerprint reader unit that had not been approved by the Secretary of State as required by Article 61(8)(b) of the Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989.On the 6th October 2007 William Elliott and Robert McKee were arrested and charged for theft of building materials. ".
- Q22909362 label "The Public Prosecution Service v William Elliott, Robert McKee".
- Q22909362 depiction MxGuildhallMay09.JPG.