Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q21187543> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 60 of
60
with 100 triples per page.
- Q21187543 subject Q8177837.
- Q21187543 subject Q8177923.
- Q21187543 subject Q8427827.
- Q21187543 subject Q8863789.
- Q21187543 subject Q8863798.
- Q21187543 abstract "P v S and Cornwall County Council was a landmark case of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which extended the scope of sex equality to discrimination against transsexuals.The case concerned a United Kingdom (UK) trans woman, referred to as P in court proceedings, who was dismissed from her post after informing her employers that she was undergoing gender reassignment. She took her employers to an Employment Tribunal. The Tribunal agreed that she had been dismissed because of her gender reassignment, but was unable to rule that she had been discriminated against because at that time the Sex Discrimination Act (SDA) offered little protection to transsexual people. If P had been a trans man, he would have been treated in the same way and so there were no grounds in the SDA to rule that P had been discriminated against. However, the UK was part of the European Community and thus obliged to implement the Equal Treatment Directive. The Tribunal felt the scope of the Directive was wider than that of the SDA and accordingly asked the ECJ for a preliminary ruling. Effectively, the Tribunal asked the Court to rule whether the Directive precluded dismissal of a transsexual for a reason related to his or her gender reassignment.The Court, assisted by an influential opinion from Advocate General Tesauro, ruled that the Directive was an expression of a fundamental principle of equality and thus that the Directive did indeed preclude dimissal for a reason related to gender reassignment. The Tribunal was able to rule in P's favour and P received compensation from her employers.It was the first piece of case law, anywhere in the world, which prevents discrimination in employment or vocational education because someone is transsexual. The scope of the ruling is considered as applying to transsexuals "intending to undergo, undergoing or [who] have undergone gender reassignment". However, the Court left open the question of employment where the natal sex or its continuity was a constitutive element in the employee's job. In UK law this is reflected in the Equality Act 2010 where transsexuals can be barred from gender-specific services if that is "a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim".".
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31976L0207:EN:HTML.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink ?uri=CELEX:61994CJ0013.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink ?uri=CELEX:32006L0054&from=EN.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink ?uri=CELEX:61994CC0013&rid=3.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink 2_2-brems.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink www.equalityhumanrights.com.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink employment-dis-full-paper.pdf.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink Report%20of%20the%20proceedings%20P%20vs%20S.pdf.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink 2532.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink www.pfc.org.uk.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink 6PW2GzYyQ.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink 6YQNnGTFJ.
- Q21187543 wikiPageExternalLink 6YQshxXBz.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q1052281.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q1053501.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q11122.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q113453.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q122880.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q1276282.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q1478218.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q1518827.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q1759312.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q180803.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q190965.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q2151398.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q22001063.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q2449503.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q2554401.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q2601872.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q316254.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q3505473.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q3774189.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q5149744.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q52847.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q5384144.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q5384171.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q627718.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q6576308.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q665141.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q7241638.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q7300770.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q7302497.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q7306395.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q7458377.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q7655162.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q8177837.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q8177923.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q8427827.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q8863789.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q8863798.
- Q21187543 wikiPageWikiLink Q912887.
- Q21187543 comment "P v S and Cornwall County Council was a landmark case of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which extended the scope of sex equality to discrimination against transsexuals.The case concerned a United Kingdom (UK) trans woman, referred to as P in court proceedings, who was dismissed from her post after informing her employers that she was undergoing gender reassignment. She took her employers to an Employment Tribunal.".
- Q21187543 label "P v S and Cornwall County Council".
- Q21187543 homepage equalityhumanrights.com.