Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q19545049> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 56 of
56
with 100 triples per page.
- Q19545049 subject Q13299866.
- Q19545049 subject Q15099861.
- Q19545049 subject Q16791564.
- Q19545049 subject Q22032019.
- Q19545049 subject Q6998020.
- Q19545049 subject Q6999058.
- Q19545049 subject Q7152674.
- Q19545049 subject Q7216264.
- Q19545049 abstract "Wikimedia Foundation, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al. is a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation and several other organizations against the National Security Agency (NSA), the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), and other named individuals, alleging mass surveillance of Wikipedia users carried out by the NSA. The suit claims upstream surveillance breaches the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects freedom of speech, and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.The suit is filed in the federal District Court for the District of Maryland; the NSA is based in Fort Meade, Maryland.The plaintiffs are the Wikimedia Foundation, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International USA, the PEN American Center, the Global Fund for Women, The Nation magazine, the Rutherford Institute, and the Washington Office on Latin America.Upstream surveillance was first revealed by Edward Snowden, a former NSA analyst. A previous challenge by the ACLU, Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, failed for lack of standing, but Wikimedia and the ACLU believe their new lawsuit will succeed in the light of Snowden's disclosures, citing a classified NSA slide that specifically referred to Wikipedia. Since Clapper, the government itself has confirmed many of the key facts about NSA's upstream surveillance, including that it conducts suspicionless searches. ACLU attorney Patrick Toomey noted the lawsuit is particularly relevant as the plaintiffs engage in "hundreds of billions of international communications" annually. Any program of upstream surveillance must necessarily sweep up a substantial part of these communications.On August 6, 2015, the defendants brought a motion to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiffs have not plausibly shown that they have been injured by upstream collection of data and thus lack standing to sue. In response, the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed an amicus brief on behalf of a group of libraries and booksellers. Both sides presented oral arguments at a hearing on September 25, 2015.On October 23, 2015, the District Court for the District of Maryland dismissed the suit on grounds of standing. US District Judge T. S. Ellis III ruled that the plaintiffs could not plausibly prove they were subject to upstream surveillance, echoing the 2013 decision in Clapper v. Amnesty International US. The Wikimedia Foundation said it expected to appeal the decision. The Foundation said its complaint had merit, and that there was no question that upstream surveillance captured the communications of both its user community and the Wikimedia Foundation itself. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, who had filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs, said it was perverse to dismiss a suit for lack of proof (standing) when the surveillance program complained of was secret, and urged federal courts to tackle the serious constitutional issues that upstream surveillance presents.".
- Q19545049 thumbnail DistrictCourtMarylandSeal.png?width=300.
- Q19545049 wikiPageExternalLink wikimedia-v-nsa.
- Q19545049 wikiPageExternalLink wikimedia_v2c_nsa_-_complaint.pdf.
- Q19545049 wikiPageExternalLink Why%20Are%20We%20Interested%20in%20HTTP.pdf.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q1154057.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q121194.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q12616.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q13299866.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q13424289.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q1425056.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q15099861.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q15147948.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q1553390.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q15688765.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q15975538.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q16791564.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q1681008.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q180.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q187052.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q1897630.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q21637.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q22032019.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q231304.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q2843739.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q312644.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q329777.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q3566512.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q46350.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q5167436.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q529755.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q5570320.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q6189518.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q624023.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q683979.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q6970646.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998020.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q6999058.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q7118978.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q7152674.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q7216264.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q7383344.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q755026.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q7668662.
- Q19545049 wikiPageWikiLink Q7889775.
- Q19545049 comment "Wikimedia Foundation, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al. is a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation and several other organizations against the National Security Agency (NSA), the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), and other named individuals, alleging mass surveillance of Wikipedia users carried out by the NSA.".
- Q19545049 label "Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA".
- Q19545049 depiction DistrictCourtMarylandSeal.png.