Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q19087249> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 51 of
51
with 100 triples per page.
- Q19087249 subject Q6996306.
- Q19087249 subject Q6997039.
- Q19087249 subject Q6997098.
- Q19087249 subject Q6997210.
- Q19087249 subject Q6998756.
- Q19087249 abstract "Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 (1957), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States where the Court ruled that involuntary blood samples, taken by a skilled technician to determine intoxication, do not violate substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This case was only the second time the Court considered whether police could forcibly enter inside a suspect's body to extract evidence. Writing for a 6-3 majority, Justice Tom C. Clark argued that blood tests were necessary as a matter of public policy to ensure traffic safety on roads and highways, and that "modern community living requires modern scientific methods of crime detection." Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justice William O. Douglas both wrote dissenting opinions in which they argued that the involuntary blood sample taken in this case was "repulsive" and violated substantive due process.".
- Q19087249 wikiPageExternalLink 432.html.
- Q19087249 wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q1002253.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q11144.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q11147.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q11698.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q127076.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q1370.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q1391996.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q1403472.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q14706079.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q188116.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q231304.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q240340.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q2658870.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q311197.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q3243198.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q6602391.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q6879919.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996306.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997039.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997098.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997210.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q6998756.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q717401.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q724116.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q7354091.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q7431786.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q7632092.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q8026154.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q81225.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q852577.
- Q19087249 wikiPageWikiLink Q908639.
- Q19087249 fullname "Paul H. Breithaupt, Petitioner, v. Morris Abram, Warden.".
- Q19087249 type Case.
- Q19087249 type LegalCase.
- Q19087249 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q19087249 type UnitOfWork.
- Q19087249 type Situation.
- Q19087249 type Thing.
- Q19087249 type Q2334719.
- Q19087249 comment "Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 (1957), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States where the Court ruled that involuntary blood samples, taken by a skilled technician to determine intoxication, do not violate substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This case was only the second time the Court considered whether police could forcibly enter inside a suspect's body to extract evidence. Writing for a 6-3 majority, Justice Tom C.".
- Q19087249 label "Breithaupt v. Abram".
- Q19087249 name "Paul H. Breithaupt, Petitioner, v. Morris Abram, Warden.".