Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q1752697> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 50 of
50
with 100 triples per page.
- Q1752697 subject Q6306579.
- Q1752697 abstract "An argument from nonbelief is a philosophical argument that asserts an inconsistency between the existence of God and a world in which people fail to recognize him. It is similar to the classic argument from evil in affirming an inconsistency between the world that exists and the world that would exist if God had certain desires combined with the power to see them through.There are two key varieties of the argument. The argument from reasonable nonbelief (or the argument from divine hiddenness) was first elaborated in J. L. Schellenberg's 1993 book Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason. This argument says that if God existed (and was perfectly good and loving) every reasonable person would have been brought to believe in God; however, there are reasonable nonbelievers; therefore, this God does not exist.Theodore Drange subsequently developed the argument from nonbelief, based on the mere existence of nonbelief in God. Drange considers the distinction between reasonable (by which Schellenberg means inculpable) and unreasonable (culpable) nonbelief to be irrelevant and confusing. Nevertheless, most academic discussion is concerned with Schellenberg's formulation.".
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink 245-divine-hiddenness.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink maitzen.html.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink maitzen_cv.html.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink pubs.html.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink papersandbooks.html.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink hid.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink nonbelief.html.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink www.jlschellenberg.com.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink idolanon.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink www.philosophyofreligion.info.
- Q1752697 wikiPageExternalLink divinehiddennessandfaith.html.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q101849.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q1062821.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q11309676.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q1290.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q15453060.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q16193351.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q1699404.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q1771260.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q186619.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q1932138.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q210143.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q2337894.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q23404.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q313073.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q335125.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q33760.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q3425000.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q355201.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q41064.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q43004.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q43939.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q4789743.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q48235.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q5158426.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q531931.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q6055576.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q6306579.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q646518.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q6512.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q7151232.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q7311414.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q7451159.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q840665.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q9358.
- Q1752697 wikiPageWikiLink Q9471.
- Q1752697 comment "An argument from nonbelief is a philosophical argument that asserts an inconsistency between the existence of God and a world in which people fail to recognize him. It is similar to the classic argument from evil in affirming an inconsistency between the world that exists and the world that would exist if God had certain desires combined with the power to see them through.There are two key varieties of the argument.".
- Q1752697 label "Argument from nonbelief".