Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q17135794> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 15 of
15
with 100 triples per page.
- Q17135794 subject Q8429828.
- Q17135794 abstract "Evidence hierarchies reflect the relative authority of various types of biomedical research. Although there is no single, universally-accepted hierarchy of evidence, there is broad agreement on the relative strength of the principal types of research, or epidemiological studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) rank above observational studies, while expert opinion and anecdotal experience are ranked at the bottom. Some evidence hierarchies place systematic review and meta analysis above RCTs, since these often combine data from multiple RCTs, and possibly from other study types as well. Evidence hierarchies are integral to evidence-based medicine.The use of evidence hierarchies has been criticized as allowing RCTs too much authority. Not all research questions can be answered through RCTs, either because of practical issues or because of ethical issues. Moreover, even when evidence is available from high-quality RCTs, evidence from other study types may still be relevant.Greenhalgh suggests that "the relative weight carried by the different types of primary study when making decisions about clinical interventions (the “hierarchy of evidence”) puts them in the following order: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of "RCTs with definitive results". RCTs with definitive results (confidence intervals that do not overlap the threshold clinically significant effect) RCTs with non-definitive results (a point estimate that suggests a clinically significant effect but with confidence intervals overlapping the threshold for this effect) Cohort studies Case-control studies Cross sectional surveys Case reports↑ ↑ ↑".
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q1436668.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q1504425.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q1778788.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q2752427.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q2782326.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q691640.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q815382.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q818574.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q8429828.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q954027.
- Q17135794 wikiPageWikiLink Q961652.
- Q17135794 comment "Evidence hierarchies reflect the relative authority of various types of biomedical research. Although there is no single, universally-accepted hierarchy of evidence, there is broad agreement on the relative strength of the principal types of research, or epidemiological studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) rank above observational studies, while expert opinion and anecdotal experience are ranked at the bottom.".
- Q17135794 label "Hierarchy of evidence".