Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q16988726> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 23 of
23
with 100 triples per page.
- Q16988726 subject Q15135464.
- Q16988726 subject Q6996388.
- Q16988726 subject Q6997039.
- Q16988726 abstract "Fernandez v. California, 134 S. Ct. 1126, was a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. Fernandez, however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.".
- Q16988726 wikiPageExternalLink fernanedz-v-california.
- Q16988726 wikiPageWikiLink Q11201.
- Q16988726 wikiPageWikiLink Q15135464.
- Q16988726 wikiPageWikiLink Q231304.
- Q16988726 wikiPageWikiLink Q5547978.
- Q16988726 wikiPageWikiLink Q6996388.
- Q16988726 wikiPageWikiLink Q6997039.
- Q16988726 wikiPageWikiLink Q7893391.
- Q16988726 fullname "Walter Fernandez, Petitioner v. California".
- Q16988726 type Case.
- Q16988726 type LegalCase.
- Q16988726 type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Q16988726 type UnitOfWork.
- Q16988726 type Situation.
- Q16988726 type Thing.
- Q16988726 type Q2334719.
- Q16988726 comment "Fernandez v. California, 134 S. Ct. 1126, was a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. Fernandez, however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonable purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.".
- Q16988726 label "Fernandez v. California".
- Q16988726 name "Walter Fernandez, Petitioner v. California".