Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/resource/Q15133842> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 37 of
37
with 100 triples per page.
- Q15133842 subject Q6173086.
- Q15133842 subject Q6453410.
- Q15133842 subject Q7023851.
- Q15133842 subject Q7452657.
- Q15133842 abstract "Loss of supply occurs where a government in a parliamentary democracy using the Westminster System or a system derived from it is denied a supply of treasury or exchequer funds, by whichever house or houses of parliament or head of state is constitutionally entitled to grant and deny supply. A defeat on a budgetary vote is one such way by which supply can be denied. Loss of supply is typically interpreted as indicating a loss of confidence in the government. Not all "money bills" are necessarily supply bills. For instance, in Australia, supply bills are defined as "bills which are required by the Government to carry on its day-to-day business".When a loss of supply occurs, a prime minister is generally required either by constitutional convention or by explicit constitutional instruction to either resign immediately or seek a parliamentary dissolution.Some constitutions, however, do not allow the option of parliamentary dissolution but rather require the government to be dissolved or to resign.A similar deadlock can occur within a presidential system, where it is also known as a budget crisis. In contrast to parliamentary systems, the failure of the legislature to authorize spending may not in all circumstances result in an election, because some such legislatures enjoy fixed terms and so cannot be dissolved before a date of termination, which can result in a prolonged crisis.A deadlock between a head of state and the legislative body can give rise and cause for a head of state to prematurely dismiss the elected government, requiring it to seek re-election. If a government maintains the support of a majority of legislators or the elected parliamentary representatives, the blocking of supply by a head of state would be seen as an abuse of authority and power. Many western countries have removed or restricted the right of a head of state to block supply or veto a government budget unless there is overwhelming justification and cause for such action.".
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q11007.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q1354851.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q14212.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q1425313.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q145.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q15080258.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q166747.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q188759.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q19208.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q23333.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q27.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q2720142.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q319145.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q329547.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q3374979.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q48352.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q4985031.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q49892.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q575834.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q610669.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q6173086.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q6453410.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q651981.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q7023851.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q720477.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q7452657.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q783330.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q783401.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q8646.
- Q15133842 wikiPageWikiLink Q896791.
- Q15133842 comment "Loss of supply occurs where a government in a parliamentary democracy using the Westminster System or a system derived from it is denied a supply of treasury or exchequer funds, by whichever house or houses of parliament or head of state is constitutionally entitled to grant and deny supply. A defeat on a budgetary vote is one such way by which supply can be denied. Loss of supply is typically interpreted as indicating a loss of confidence in the government.".
- Q15133842 label "Loss of supply".