Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Ju_Toy> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 triples per page.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy abstract "United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U.S. 253 (1905), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Supreme Court conceded its right to judicial review over immigration matters. The case held that “a citizen of Chinese parentage seeking admission to the United States” could be excluded by the administrative immigration authorities, even when being denied a hearing before a judicial body on the question whether they were indeed a citizen. The Court determined that refusing entry at a port does not deny due process and held that findings by immigration officials are conclusive and not subject to judicial review unless there is evidence of bias or negligence. This case marked a shift in the court in respect to habeas corpus petitions and altered the judicial landscape for citizens applying for admission into the United States as well as for those facing deportation.".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageExternalLink scholar_case?case=4024972785819654073&q=%22United+States+v.+Ju+Toy%22+OR+%22198+U.S.+253%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2006.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageID "44003143".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageLength "14439".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageOutDegree "26".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageRevisionID "644676463".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Alien_(law).
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Category:1905_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Category:History_of_San_Francisco,_California.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Category:Law_in_the_San_Francisco_Bay_Area.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Fuller_Court.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink China.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Chinese_Exclusion_Act.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Citizenship_in_the_United_States.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink David_Josiah_Brewer.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Deportation.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Due_process.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Executive_Office_for_Immigration_Review.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Geary_Act.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Habeas_corpus.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Immigration_and_Naturalization_Service.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Judicial_review.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Naturalization.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Oliver_Wendell_Holmes,_Jr..
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Rufus_Wheeler_Peckham.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink SS_Doric_(1883).
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink San_Francisco.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Scott_Act_(1888).
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Congress.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLink William_R._Day.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLinkText "''U.S.'' vs ''Ju Toy''".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageWikiLinkText "United States v. Ju Toy".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy arguedate "--04-03".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy argueyear "1905".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy citation "25".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy decidedate "--05-08".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy decideyear "1905".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy dissent "Brewer".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy fullname "United States v. Ju Toy".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy holding "The petition for habeas corpus should have been denied, refusing entry at a port does not deny due process and the findings of the immigration officials were conclusive and not subject to judicial review.".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy joindissent "Peckham, Day".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy joinmajority "Fuller,Harlan, Brown, White, McKenna".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy litigants "US v. Ju Toy".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy majority "Holmes".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy prior "Federal District Court ruled that Ju Toy was a person native to the United States and ordered his release.".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy scotus "1903".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy uspage "253".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy usvol "198".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCOTUSCase.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy subject Category:1905_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy subject Category:History_of_San_Francisco,_California.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy subject Category:Law_in_the_San_Francisco_Bay_Area.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Fuller_Court.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy type Case.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy type Situation.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy type Thing.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy type Q2334719.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy comment "United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U.S. 253 (1905), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Supreme Court conceded its right to judicial review over immigration matters. The case held that “a citizen of Chinese parentage seeking admission to the United States” could be excluded by the administrative immigration authorities, even when being denied a hearing before a judicial body on the question whether they were indeed a citizen.".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy label "United States v. Ju Toy".
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy sameAs Q18357059.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy sameAs m.0125t04b.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy sameAs Q18357059.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Ju_Toy?oldid=644676463.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Ju_Toy.
- United_States_v._Ju_Toy name "United States v. Ju Toy".