Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 64 of
64
with 100 triples per page.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs abstract "Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. ___ (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications.".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageID "43182037".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageLength "5832".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageOutDegree "22".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageRevisionID "706583564".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Abstention_doctrine.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Category:2013_in_United_States_case_law.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Category:Sprint_Corporation.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_communications_regulation_case_law.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_federal_jurisdiction_case_law.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Iowa_Utilities_Board.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Sprint_Corporation.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Telecommunications_Act_of_1996.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eighth_Circuit.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Iowa.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._FCC_(2002).
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Windstream_Holdings.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLink Younger_v._Harris.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageWikiLinkText "Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs arguedate "--11-05".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs argueyear "2013".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs decidedate "--12-10".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs decideyear "2013".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs docket "12".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs fullname "Sprint Communications Inc., Petitioner v. Elizabeth S. Jacobs et al.".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs holding "Federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded.".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs joinmajority "unanimous court".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs litigants "Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs majority "Ginsburg".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs oralargument argument.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs prior "259200.0".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs scotus "2010".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs uspage "___".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs usvol "571".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Sprint.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Ussc.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs subject Category:2013_in_United_States_case_law.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs subject Category:Sprint_Corporation.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs subject Category:United_States_communications_regulation_case_law.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs subject Category:United_States_federal_jurisdiction_case_law.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs type Case.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs type LegalCase.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs type UnitOfWork.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs type Situation.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs type Thing.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs type Q2334719.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs comment "Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. ___ (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications.".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs label "Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs".
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs sameAs Q18154507.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs sameAs m.0113p6g7.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs sameAs Q18154507.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs wasDerivedFrom Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs?oldid=706583564.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs isPrimaryTopicOf Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs.
- Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs name "Sprint Communications Inc., Petitioner v. Elizabeth S. Jacobs et al.".