Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rose_v_Plenty> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 triples per page.
- Rose_v_Plenty abstract "Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141 is an English tort law case, on the issue of where an employee is acting within the course of their employment. Vicarious liability was tenuously found under John William Salmond's test for course of employment, which states that an employer will be held liable for either a wrongful act they have authorised, or a wrongful and unauthorised mode of an act that was authorised.".
- Rose_v_Plenty thumbnail Dairy_Crest_Milk_Float_Garage_2.jpg?width=300.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageID "23534937".
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageLength "4955".
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageOutDegree "24".
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageRevisionID "699690264".
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Bristol.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Category:1975_in_British_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Category:1975_in_case_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Category:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales_cases.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Category:English_tort_case_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Category:English_vicarious_liability_case_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Category:Lord_Denning_cases.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Contributory_negligence.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Conway_v_George_Wimpey_&_Co_Ltd.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Employment.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink English_tort_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Fracture.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Frederick_Lawton_(judge).
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink John_Salmond_(judge).
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Leslie_Scarman,_Baron_Scarman.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Limpus_v_London_General_Omnibus_Company.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Milkman.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Twine_v_Beans_Express_Ltd.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Vicarious_liability.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLink Vicarious_liability_in_English_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageWikiLinkText "Rose v Plenty".
- Rose_v_Plenty citations "[1976] 1 WLR 141".
- Rose_v_Plenty court Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales.
- Rose_v_Plenty dateDecided "1975-07-07".
- Rose_v_Plenty keywords "Vicarious liability, course of employment".
- Rose_v_Plenty name "Rose v Plenty".
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cquote.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_court_case.
- Rose_v_Plenty wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Rose_v_Plenty subject Category:1975_in_British_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty subject Category:1975_in_case_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty subject Category:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales_cases.
- Rose_v_Plenty subject Category:English_tort_case_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty subject Category:English_vicarious_liability_case_law.
- Rose_v_Plenty subject Category:Lord_Denning_cases.
- Rose_v_Plenty hypernym Case.
- Rose_v_Plenty type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Rose_v_Plenty comment "Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141 is an English tort law case, on the issue of where an employee is acting within the course of their employment. Vicarious liability was tenuously found under John William Salmond's test for course of employment, which states that an employer will be held liable for either a wrongful act they have authorised, or a wrongful and unauthorised mode of an act that was authorised.".
- Rose_v_Plenty label "Rose v Plenty".
- Rose_v_Plenty sameAs Q7368029.
- Rose_v_Plenty sameAs m.06w98ly.
- Rose_v_Plenty sameAs Q7368029.
- Rose_v_Plenty wasDerivedFrom Rose_v_Plenty?oldid=699690264.
- Rose_v_Plenty depiction Dairy_Crest_Milk_Float_Garage_2.jpg.
- Rose_v_Plenty isPrimaryTopicOf Rose_v_Plenty.