Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 triples per page.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd abstract "Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd [1966] 1 QB 716 is an English tort law case, establishing that sub-bailees are liable for the theft or negligence of their staff. Both Lord Denning and Lord Diplock rejected the idea that a contract need exist for a relationship of bailor and bailee to be found. Accordingly, it established an authority in vicarious liability, that employers are fully liable for the thefts - by employees - of goods that they have a duty to take care of.".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd thumbnail Brasilian_otter_fur_coat.JPG?width=300.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageID "23558644".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageLength "5181".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageOutDegree "25".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageRevisionID "693704258".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Bailment.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:1965_in_British_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:1965_in_case_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales_cases.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:English_tort_case_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:English_vicarious_liability_case_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Category:Lord_Denning_cases.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Cheshire_v_Bailey.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Contract.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Conversion_(law).
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Duty_of_care_in_English_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink English_tort_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Fur_clothing.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink John_Salmond_(judge).
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Kenneth_Diplock,_Baron_Diplock.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink London.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Mink.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Vicarious_liability.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLink Vicarious_liability_in_English_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageWikiLinkText "Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd citations "[1966] 1 QB 716".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd court Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd dateDecided "1965-05-19".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd keywords "Sub-bailment, duty of care, theft".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd name "Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_journal.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cquote.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_court_case.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd subject Category:1965_in_British_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd subject Category:1965_in_case_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd subject Category:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales_cases.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd subject Category:English_tort_case_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd subject Category:English_vicarious_liability_case_law.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd subject Category:Lord_Denning_cases.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd hypernym Case.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd comment "Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd [1966] 1 QB 716 is an English tort law case, establishing that sub-bailees are liable for the theft or negligence of their staff. Both Lord Denning and Lord Diplock rejected the idea that a contract need exist for a relationship of bailor and bailee to be found. Accordingly, it established an authority in vicarious liability, that employers are fully liable for the thefts - by employees - of goods that they have a duty to take care of.".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd label "Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd".
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd sameAs Q6913967.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd sameAs m.06w4y8_.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd sameAs Q6913967.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd wasDerivedFrom Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd?oldid=693704258.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd depiction Brasilian_otter_fur_coat.JPG.
- Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd isPrimaryTopicOf Morris_v_CW_Martin_&_Sons_Ltd.