Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Milgram_v._Orbitz> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 56 of
56
with 100 triples per page.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz abstract "In Milgram v. Orbitz Worldwide, LLC, the New Jersey Superior Court held that online ticket resellers qualified for immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), and that such immunity preempted a state law consumer fraud statute. The opinion clarified the court's test for determining whether a defendant is acting as a publisher, the applicability of the CDA to e-commerce sites, and the extent of control that an online intermediary may exercise over user content without becoming an \"information content provider\" under the CDA. The opinion was hailed by one observer as a \"rare defeat for a consumer protection agency\" and the \"biggest defense win of the year\" in CDA § 230 litigation.".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageExternalLink Milgram-v-Orbitz.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageID "31058977".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageLength "16400".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageOutDegree "29".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageRevisionID "645397717".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Anne_Milgram.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Barnes_v._Yahoo!,_Inc..
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Bruce_Springsteen.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Carafano_v._Metrosplash.com,_Inc..
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Category:2010_in_New_Jersey.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Category:2010_in_United_States_case_law.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Category:New_Jersey_state_case_law.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Category:Orbitz_brands.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Category:Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Internet_case_law.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink CheapTickets.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Communications_Decency_Act.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink False_pretenses.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Federal_preemption.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Fraud.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Misrepresentation.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink New_Jersey_Division_of_Consumer_Affairs.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink New_Jersey_Superior_Court.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Online_service_provider.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Orbitz.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Stratton_Oakmont,_Inc._v._Prodigy_Services_Co..
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLink Unconscionability.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLinkText "Milgram v. Orbitz Worldwide, LLC".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageWikiLinkText "Milgram v. Orbitz".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz citations Milgram-v-Orbitz.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz court New_Jersey_Superior_Court.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz dateDecided "2010-08-26".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz fullName "Milgram v. Orbitz Worldwide, LLC".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz italicTitle "yes".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz judges "Hon. Patricia K. Costello".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz keywords "CDA § 230, federal preemption, fraud, misrepresentation.".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz name "Milgram v. Orbitz".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz opinions "CDA § 230 precludes liability where the duty that the plaintiff alleges the defendant violated derives from the defendant's status or conduct as a publisher or speaker. The name or wording of the cause of action, and whether the defendant is a commercial actor, are not dispositive. Where objectionable content is not supplied, required, or requested by a defendant, the defendant is not an information content provider under the CDA, even if it performs traditional editorial functions such as selective deletion or alteration of user content.".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_Court_Case.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz subject Category:2010_in_New_Jersey.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz subject Category:2010_in_United_States_case_law.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz subject Category:New_Jersey_state_case_law.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz subject Category:Orbitz_brands.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz subject Category:Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz subject Category:United_States_Internet_case_law.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz comment "In Milgram v. Orbitz Worldwide, LLC, the New Jersey Superior Court held that online ticket resellers qualified for immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), and that such immunity preempted a state law consumer fraud statute.".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz label "Milgram v. Orbitz".
- Milgram_v._Orbitz sameAs Q6851799.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz sameAs m.0gg9dtr.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz sameAs Q6851799.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz wasDerivedFrom Milgram_v._Orbitz?oldid=645397717.
- Milgram_v._Orbitz isPrimaryTopicOf Milgram_v._Orbitz.