Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 triples per page.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue abstract "MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue, 553 U.S. 16 (2008) is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the extent a state may tax companies that are not based in their state. Mead, a corporation based out of Ohio, owned Lexis-Nexis, which was based out of Illinois. Mead sold Lexis, and Illinois maintained that Mead must pay them a proportionate capital-gains tax. Illinois asserted that Mead and Lexis were integrated to the extent required for the \"unitary business rule\". This rule allowed states to tax a proportionate share of the value generated by an interstate corporation. The Supreme Court held that the two businesses were not integrated enough to be considered a \"unitary business\" and Illinois was not allowed to tax Mead on the Lexis sale.".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageID "17578775".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageLength "1950".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageOutDegree "12".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageRevisionID "645401758".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Capital_gains_tax.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Category:2008_in_United_States_case_law.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Category:Capital_gains_taxes.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Category:State_taxation_in_the_United_States.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_taxation_and_revenue_case_law.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Illinois.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink LexisNexis.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink MeadWestvaco.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Ohio.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageWikiLinkText "MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue arguedate "--01-16".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue argueyear "2008".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue citation "17280.0".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue concurrence "Thomas".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue decidedate "--04-15".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue decideyear "2008".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue docket "6".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue fullname "MeadWestvaco Corp., Successor in Interest to Mead Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue, et al.".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue holding "The state courts erred in considering whether Lexis served an “operational purpose” in Mead’s business after determining that Lexis and Mead were not unitary.".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue joinmajority "unanimous court".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue litigants "MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue majority "Alito".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue prior "Certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue scotus "2006".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue uspage "16".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue usvol "553".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCOTUS-stub.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue subject Category:2008_in_United_States_case_law.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue subject Category:Capital_gains_taxes.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue subject Category:State_taxation_in_the_United_States.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue subject Category:United_States_taxation_and_revenue_case_law.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue type Case.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue type LegalCase.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue type UnitOfWork.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue type Redirect.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue type Situation.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue type Thing.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue type Q2334719.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue comment "MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue, 553 U.S. 16 (2008) is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the extent a state may tax companies that are not based in their state. Mead, a corporation based out of Ohio, owned Lexis-Nexis, which was based out of Illinois. Mead sold Lexis, and Illinois maintained that Mead must pay them a proportionate capital-gains tax. Illinois asserted that Mead and Lexis were integrated to the extent required for the \"unitary business rule\".".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue label "MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue".
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue sameAs Q6803127.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue sameAs m.0466g58.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue sameAs Q6803127.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue wasDerivedFrom MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue?oldid=645401758.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue isPrimaryTopicOf MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue.
- MeadWestvaco_Corp._v._Illinois_Department_of_Revenue name "MeadWestvaco Corp., Successor in Interest to Mead Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue, et al.".