Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hunt_v._Cromartie> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 triples per page.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie abstract "Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 U.S. 541 (1999), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding North Carolina's 12th congressional district. In an earlier case, Shaw v. Reno, 517 U.S. 899 (1995), the Supreme Court ruled that the 12th district of North Carolina as drawn was unconstitutional because it was created for the purpose of placing African Americans in one district, thereby constituting illegal racial gerrymandering. The Court ordered the state of North Carolina to redraw the boundaries of the district.In this follow-up case, the Supreme Court ruled that the state was able to justify the new boundaries of the 12th district by showing that it was intended to create a safe seat for Democrats, and therefore the redrawn district was a constitutional example of political gerrymandering. Justice O'Connor acted as the swing vote, satisfied with the change in reasoning since Shaw v. Reno.".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageExternalLink 98-85.ZS.html.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageID "182939".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageLength "3281".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageOutDegree "22".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageRevisionID "648874252".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Case_citation.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:1999_in_North_Carolina.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:1999_in_United_States_case_law.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:Congressional_districts_of_North_Carolina.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:Legal_history_of_North_Carolina.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Democratic_Party_(United_States).
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Easley_v._Cromartie.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Gerrymandering.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Jim_Hunt.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_526.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink North_Carolinas_12th_congressional_district.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Shaw_v._Reno.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageWikiLinkText "Hunt v. Cromartie".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie arguedate "--08-04".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie argueyear "1999".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie concurrence "Stevens".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie decidedate "--05-17".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie decideyear "1999".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie fullname "James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina, et al., Appellants v. Martin Cromartie, et al.".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie holding "The 12th district of North Carolina as drawn was unconstitutional because it was created for the purpose of placing African Americans in one district, thereby constituting illegal racial gerrymandering.".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie joinconcurrence "Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie joinmajority "Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie litigants "Hunt v. Cromartie".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie majority "Thomas".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie scotus "1994".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie uspage "541".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie usvol "526".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Cite_journal.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:SCOTUS-stub.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Ussc.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:1999_in_North_Carolina.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:1999_in_United_States_case_law.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:Congressional_districts_of_North_Carolina.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:Legal_history_of_North_Carolina.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type Case.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type District.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type LegalCase.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type UnitOfWork.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type District.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type Redirect.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type Situation.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type Thing.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie type Q2334719.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie comment "Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 U.S. 541 (1999), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding North Carolina's 12th congressional district. In an earlier case, Shaw v. Reno, 517 U.S. 899 (1995), the Supreme Court ruled that the 12th district of North Carolina as drawn was unconstitutional because it was created for the purpose of placing African Americans in one district, thereby constituting illegal racial gerrymandering.".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie label "Hunt v. Cromartie".
- Hunt_v._Cromartie sameAs Q15147968.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie sameAs m.018_c5.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie sameAs Q15147968.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie wasDerivedFrom Hunt_v._Cromartie?oldid=648874252.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie isPrimaryTopicOf Hunt_v._Cromartie.
- Hunt_v._Cromartie name "James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina, et al., Appellants v. Martin Cromartie, et al.".