Matches in DBpedia 2016-04 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hamed_v_R> ?p ?o }
Showing triples 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 triples per page.
- Hamed_v_R abstract "Hamed & Ors v. R [2011] NZSC 101 was a decision by the Supreme Court of New Zealand which ruled on the admissibility of video surveillance. The ruling held that evidence collected using criminal trespass on private land to conduct covert surveillance under a warrant is only admissible for serious crimes. The charges involved were related to the 2007 New Zealand anti-terror raids, as a result of the ruling, charges against all but four of the defendants were dropped.The ruling was initially suppressed from 24 March 2011 to September 2011. Very shortly after the lifting of the suppression, the Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Act 2011 was introduced and passed under urgency.".
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageID "33310928".
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageLength "2648".
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageOutDegree "6".
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageRevisionID "678261407".
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageWikiLink 2007_New_Zealand_police_raids.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageWikiLink Category:2011_in_New_Zealand_law.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageWikiLink Category:2011_in_case_law.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageWikiLink Category:Supreme_Court_of_New_Zealand_cases.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageWikiLink Supreme_Court_of_New_Zealand.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageWikiLink Video_Camera_Surveillance_(Temporary_Measures)_Act_2011.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageWikiLinkText "''Hamed & Ors. v R''".
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageWikiLinkText "Hamed v R".
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Italic_title.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:NewZealand-case-law-stub.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Reflist.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Use_New_Zealand_English.
- Hamed_v_R wikiPageUsesTemplate Template:Use_dmy_dates.
- Hamed_v_R subject Category:2011_in_New_Zealand_law.
- Hamed_v_R subject Category:2011_in_case_law.
- Hamed_v_R subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_New_Zealand_cases.
- Hamed_v_R comment "Hamed & Ors v. R [2011] NZSC 101 was a decision by the Supreme Court of New Zealand which ruled on the admissibility of video surveillance. The ruling held that evidence collected using criminal trespass on private land to conduct covert surveillance under a warrant is only admissible for serious crimes.".
- Hamed_v_R label "Hamed v R".
- Hamed_v_R sameAs Q5644433.
- Hamed_v_R sameAs m.0h7qrnm.
- Hamed_v_R sameAs Q5644433.
- Hamed_v_R wasDerivedFrom Hamed_v_R?oldid=678261407.
- Hamed_v_R isPrimaryTopicOf Hamed_v_R.